Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/pjs vaul sube #54

Open
wants to merge 66 commits into
base: feat/async-signer
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Feat/pjs vaul sube #54

wants to merge 66 commits into from

Conversation

S0c5
Copy link
Member

@S0c5 S0c5 commented May 6, 2024

No description provided.

S0c5 and others added 30 commits April 23, 2024 22:37
…r.rs to use Generic type for Simple vault. Update Vault implementation in simple.rs to use Generic type for Simple vault
…struct. Add missing imports and fix formatting issues
…-rs to improve functionality and maintainability
S0c5 and others added 23 commits May 1, 2024 12:49
…0x" from the payload in the sign method. Fix log message in the sign method
…ib.rs. Fix function signatures, add missing type definitions, and implement default methods for QueryBuilder and TxBuilder. Add error handling and logging for better clarity and debugging
…ending transactions with updated URL and builder implementation
@S0c5 S0c5 changed the base branch from main to feature/sube-light May 6, 2024 04:39
@S0c5 S0c5 changed the base branch from feature/sube-light to feat/async-signer May 6, 2024 04:40
S0c5 added 5 commits May 17, 2024 17:35
* feat: Add len method to Value structure

* feat(builder): add methods for querying storage and getting paged keys

* feat: Add generic deserialization for RPC requests

* refactor: Remove unnecessary code and simplify storage key handling

* feat: Add new structs and implementations

* style: improve logging message and code structure

* fix: Fix redundant code in extract_touple_type function

* refactor(meta_ext): Update build_call method to accept an optional key_ty_id

* chore: remove commented code and update communities example
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants