Use a reference to store the LHS of assignments #981
Conversation
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
PetroZarytskyi
force-pushed
the
innermost
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8789b9e to
3404230
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #981 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.94% 93.80% -0.15%
==========================================
Files 55 55
Lines 8062 8065 +3
==========================================
- Hits 7574 7565 -9
- Misses 488 500 +12
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes
|
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
test/Gradient/Assignments.C
Outdated
| //CHECK-NEXT: double &_t1 = (t *= x); | ||
| //CHECK-NEXT: _t2 = t; | ||
| //CHECK-NEXT: _t1 *= y; | ||
| //CHECK-NEXT: _t1 = &(t *= x); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is that right? Aren't we taking the address of a temporary that gets destroyed at the end of the expression?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The value of t *= x is a reference to t. So &(t *= x) should give the address of t. Anyway, we used to declare a reference to the same expression and references are pointers under the hood. So this change shouldn't affect the performance or behavior.
|
@PetroZarytskyi, #971 is merged. Can you rebase? |
PetroZarytskyi
force-pushed
the
innermost
branch
from
3404230 to
4c53c1f
Compare
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
PetroZarytskyi
force-pushed
the
innermost
branch
from
4c53c1f to
cf0984b
Compare
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
PetroZarytskyi
force-pushed
the
innermost
branch
from
cf0984b to
d4c0d6c
Compare
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
I believe the codecov complaint is because we removed more code and it thinks the coverage is reduced... |
This PR is created to fix #759.