-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SILKIT-1477 SystemController Utility: Use SignalHandler, better report state #33
SILKIT-1477 SystemController Utility: Use SignalHandler, better report state #33
Conversation
…enarios * Leaner messages: "SIL Kit simulation" => "simulation"
…VAsioConnection.cpp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only looked at the SignalHandler.cpp: we should initialize the stack variables
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The two critical changes should be reverted, otherwise ok👍
* Reverted change which made error state a final state, so that the system can still be debugged * Reverted change that made previous call-replied action be ignored, so that new call-replied action will be ignored, as previously. Issue must be handled correctly, e.g. by supporting multiple barriers. * Fixed several issues in SignalHandler.cpp
Thanks for your reviews, all suggestions were implemented. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Subject
Improvements of SystemController utility
Description
SILKIT-1477
System controller blocks new participants after required participants have terminated
std::cin.ignore()
cannot be canceled).SIgnalHandler had to be turned into a reusable module, previously owned by Registry utility.
Instructions for review / testing
Developer checklist (address before review)