Merge pull request #125 from chrishavlin/fix_andrade_test_typo

fix typo in docstring of test for analytical_andrade

vbr/testing/test_vbrcore_011_analytical_andrade.m

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 function TestResult = test_vbrcore_011_analytical_andrade()
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-% TestResult = test_vbrcore_010_premelt_volatiles()
+% TestResult = test_vbrcore_011_analytical_andrade()
 %
-% test for volatile behavior
+% test that analytical_andrade runs with the different viscosity options
 %
 % Parameters
 % ----------
@@ -110,4 +110,4 @@
     VBR.in.SV.f = [0.01, .1, 1.0]; % [Hz]
 
     fdep_size = [sz(1), sz(2), numel(VBR.in.SV.f)]; % size of freq-dep outputs
-end
+end

vbr/vbrCore/functions/Q_andrade_analytical.m

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 function [VBR] = Q_andrade_analytical(VBR)
   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-  % [VBR]=Q_andrade_simple(VBR)
+  % [VBR]=Q_andrade_analytical(VBR)
   %
   % the analytical andrade model. See supplement of Lau and Holtzman, 2019,
   % https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083529, for a nice, succinct formulation.
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
   %
   % Output:
   % ------
-  % VBR    the VBR structure, with VBR.out.anelastic.MTH2011 structure
+  % VBR    the VBR structure, with VBR.out.anelastic.analytical structure
   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
   method_settings = VBR.in.anelastic.andrade_analytical;
@@ -100,4 +100,4 @@
   VBR.out.anelastic.andrade_analytical.units = Q_method_units();
   VBR.out.anelastic.andrade_analytical.units.tau_M = 's';
 
-end
+end