Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v3 - full width toggle for images section #836

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mathiazom
Copy link
Contributor

@mathiazom mathiazom commented Oct 29, 2024

Introduces a "Full Width" toggle on the Images section. This allows the content editor to specify wether or not the images should use the full width of the customer case (1400px), or be limit to the content width (960px)

Toggle

image

Full Width

image

Regular Width

image

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 29, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
variant-no ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 29, 2024 1:24pm
variant-se-2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 29, 2024 1:24pm

Copy link
Contributor

@idamand idamand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM :)

@mathiazom mathiazom force-pushed the feat/v3-image-block-wide branch from 5cecb14 to 6133cbf Compare October 29, 2024 13:11
@mathiazom mathiazom changed the base branch from v3 to feat/v3-image-block-row October 29, 2024 13:12
Base automatically changed from feat/v3-image-block-row to v3 October 29, 2024 13:18
@mathiazom mathiazom force-pushed the feat/v3-image-block-wide branch from 6133cbf to f876c1b Compare October 29, 2024 13:20
@mathiazom mathiazom merged commit 29051a1 into v3 Oct 29, 2024
6 checks passed
@mathiazom mathiazom deleted the feat/v3-image-block-wide branch October 29, 2024 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants