Implement concurrent memcpy for building Python objects into vineyard #1646
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
sighingnow
force-pushed
the
ht/concurrent-memcpy
branch
from
cc113f9
to
fb08818
Compare
Signed-off-by: Tao He <[email protected]>
sighingnow
force-pushed
the
ht/concurrent-memcpy
branch
from
fb08818
to
b68220f
Compare
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove the problematic
.bufferproperty (as it cannot bind the lifetime of the underlying blob to the memoryview object) and add concurrent support for memcpy for faster object building.Fixes #1631