Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Metaschema Enhancements Needed for Rule Construct in Component Definition #1124

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

aj-stein-nist
Copy link
Contributor

Committer Notes

These are examples of metaschema model changes that will be required for #1058, and to support example document instances as seen in usnistgov/oscal-content#94.

NOTE: These are labelled WIP (Work In Progress) and are subject to change. Please report feedback on the issue, but also check for updates to the shape of the code as it changes.

All Submissions:

  • Have you selected the correct base branch per Contributing guidance?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
  • Do all automated CI/CD checks pass?

Changes to Core Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you included examples of how to use your new feature(s)?
  • Have you updated all OSCAL website and readme documentation affected by the changes you made? Changes to the OSCAL website can be made in the docs/content directory of your branch.
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?

Sorry, something went wrong.

david-waltermire and others added 5 commits January 31, 2022 08:54
* Many fixes to the constraints in the OSCAL metaschemas to repair broken Metapaths.
* fixing defects in metaschema constraints
* Updating to latest Metaschema toolchain. Removed use of the "require" constraint.
* updating readme with current links

Unverified

This commit is not signed, but one or more authors requires that any commit attributed to them is signed.

Unverified

This commit is not signed, but one or more authors requires that any commit attributed to them is signed.

Unverified

This commit is not signed, but one or more authors requires that any commit attributed to them is signed.

Unverified

This commit is not signed, but one or more authors requires that any commit attributed to them is signed.
@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist self-assigned this Feb 3, 2022
@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist changed the title Issue 1058 rules metaschema draft [WIP] Metaschema Enhancements Needed for Rule Construct in Component Definition Feb 3, 2022
@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist linked an issue Feb 3, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
12 tasks
@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist added the Discussion Needed This issues needs to be reviewed by the OSCAL development team. label Feb 3, 2022
@david-waltermire david-waltermire marked this pull request as draft February 26, 2022 20:26
@aj-stein-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

Per the request of Dave, I will close this and create the branch from my fork, per updated guidelines in #1157.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Needed This issues needs to be reviewed by the OSCAL development team.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for "Rules" in OSCAL Models
2 participants