Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgrade to OpenStudio 3.8 & Ruby 3.2 #154

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Upgrade to OpenStudio 3.8 & Ruby 3.2 #154

wants to merge 14 commits into from
+32 −24

Conversation

vtnate
Copy link
Collaborator

@vtnate vtnate commented Jul 16, 2024

Resolves #[issue number here]

Pull Request Description

The current version of OpenStudio, v3.8 includes a major breaking change to move from Ruby 2.7.2 to Ruby 3.2.2.

Checklist (Delete lines that don't apply)

  • Unit tests have been added or updated
  • Documentation has been modified appropriately
  • All ci tests pass (green)
  • An ISSUE has been created that this is addressing. Issues will get added to the Change Log when the change_log.rb script is run.
  • This branch is up-to-date with develop

@vtnate vtnate added enhancement New feature or request dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Jul 16, 2024
@vtnate vtnate self-assigned this Jul 16, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10724343893

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 66.44%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9721884560: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1174
Relevant Lines: 1767
💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@vtnate vtnate

Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@vtnate @coveralls