Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhancement(landing): link to glossary from footer & github #2684

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

p6l-richard
Copy link
Contributor

@p6l-richard p6l-richard commented Nov 25, 2024

What does this PR do?

  • adds glossary link to footer
    image

  • adds glossary link to github readme
    image

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Chore (refactoring code, technical debt, workflow improvements)
  • Enhancement (small improvements)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How should this be tested?

  • Visit unkey.com
  • click on the glossary link in the footer

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read Contributing Guide
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand areas
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Ran pnpm fmt
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Unkey Docs if changes were necessary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a "What's new" section in the README, announcing the launch of the Unkey Glossary with a hyperlink.
    • Added a new navigation link titled "Glossary" in the footer, enhancing access to glossary resources.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 25, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d4f12b0

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 25, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
engineering ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 25, 2024 8:49pm

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 25, 2024

@p6l-richard is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces two main changes to the Next.js project. A new section titled "What's new" has been added to the README.md file, highlighting the launch of "the Unkey Glossary" with a hyperlink to its page. Additionally, a new navigation link labeled "Glossary" has been incorporated into the footer.tsx file, enhancing the navigation options available to users.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/www/README.md Added a new section ## What's new with a bullet point announcing the launch of "the Unkey Glossary" with a hyperlink.
apps/www/components/footer/footer.tsx Introduced a new navigation link "Glossary" in the navigation array within the footer's "Company" section.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Documentation, Good first issue, 🕹️ oss.gg, :joystick: 150 points, hacktoberfest

Suggested reviewers

  • mcstepp
  • chronark
  • perkinsjr
  • MichaelUnkey

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.
Here is an example:

<type>[optional scope]: <description>
fix: I fixed something for Unkey

Details:

Unknown release type "enhancement" found in pull request title "enhancement(landing): link to glossary from footer & github". 

Available types:
 - feat: A new feature
 - fix: A bug fix
 - docs: Documentation only changes
 - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
 - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
 - perf: A code change that improves performance
 - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
 - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
 - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
 - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
 - revert: Reverts a previous commit

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/www/components/footer/footer.tsx (1)

Line range hint 11-43: Consider extracting navigation configuration

As the navigation structure grows with additions like the glossary link, consider extracting the navigation configuration to a separate file. This would:

  • Improve maintainability
  • Enable reuse in other parts of the application
  • Make navigation updates more centralized

Consider creating a new file like config/navigation.ts:

export const siteNavigation = [
  {
    title: "Company",
    links: [
      // ... existing links
    ],
  },
  // ... other sections
] as const;

Then import and use it in the footer:

import { siteNavigation } from "@/config/navigation";
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46b0691 and d4f12b0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/www/README.md (1 hunks)
  • apps/www/components/footer/footer.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • apps/www/README.md
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/www/components/footer/footer.tsx (1)

36-40: Verify the external flag usage with relative path

The implementation follows the correct structure and is well-integrated with the existing navigation. However, there's a potential inconsistency:

  • The link is marked as external: true but uses a relative path /glossary
  • Other external links in the navigation typically use full URLs (e.g., https://...) or special routes

Let's check how other relative paths with external flags are handled:

✅ Verification successful

External flag usage is consistent with codebase patterns

Looking at the search results, the usage of external: true with relative paths is actually a common pattern in the codebase:

  • /docs is marked as external
  • /github is marked as external
  • /discord is marked as external

The new glossary link follows this established pattern where special routes with relative paths are marked as external. This is likely intentional for consistent handling of navigation behavior in the application.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for patterns of external links with relative paths
rg --type tsx --type jsx -C 2 'external:\s*true' | rg -B 2 'href:\s*"/'

Length of output: 101


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for external links in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg --type ts --type js --type jsx --type tsx -C 2 'external:\s*true'

Length of output: 98


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for external links in all files
rg -C 2 'external:\s*true'

Length of output: 2874

{
title: "Glossary",
href: "/glossary",
external: true,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why should this be external?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chronark chronark self-assigned this Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants