You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following up on #1566 I'd like to propose a short yet good enough zen to allow us to create a frame for our decisions.
If I'm missing something important, feel free to propose it.
This is meant to be added to the py3status philosophy!
efficient and simple defaults
remember the philosophy:
no added configuration file, use the standard i3status.conf
we like py3status because it's a drop-in replacement of i3status
i3 users don't expect fancy and magical things, they use i3 because it's simple and efficient
keep configuration options and default format as simple as possible
it's not because you can that you should
on modules, expose things that you WILL use, not things that you COULD use
on core, make features and options as seamless as possible (lazy loading, sane default, no strong requirements)
good enough is good enough
strive for and accept "good enough" features / proposals and keep discussions on this topic only
you can always iterate further after it's merged IF it's worth it
one feature / idea at a time
trust and foster iteration with your peers by refraining from digressions
keep discussions focused and easy to get into
modules are responsible for user information and interactions
that is what's written in the bar and its behavior on clicks etc
core is responsible for user experience
core features and configuration options should focus on users overall experience
things that are related to the actual overall output of the bar are handled by core
smart things overlaying modules themselves also end up in the core
rely on i3status color scheme
no fancy colors by default, only i3status good/degraded/bad
if we want to provide enhanced coloring, this should be a core feature
rely on the i3bar protocol
what's possible with it, we should offer, no less no more
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agree on all points, this is a good summary of #1566. Could you please also comment on the topic of breaking changes, consolidating modules (I'm thinking about examples like the new update module which replaces all of the existing *_updates modules), rewriting modules from scratch and cleaning codebase of deprecated options when major version changes?
Following up on #1566 I'd like to propose a short yet good enough zen to allow us to create a frame for our decisions.
If I'm missing something important, feel free to propose it.
This is meant to be added to the py3status philosophy!
efficient and simple defaults
remember the philosophy:
we like py3status because it's a drop-in replacement of i3status
i3 users don't expect fancy and magical things, they use i3 because it's simple and efficient
keep configuration options and default format as simple as possible
it's not because you can that you should
on modules, expose things that you WILL use, not things that you COULD use
on core, make features and options as seamless as possible (lazy loading, sane default, no strong requirements)
good enough is good enough
strive for and accept "good enough" features / proposals and keep discussions on this topic only
you can always iterate further after it's merged IF it's worth it
one feature / idea at a time
trust and foster iteration with your peers by refraining from digressions
keep discussions focused and easy to get into
modules are responsible for user information and interactions
that is what's written in the bar and its behavior on clicks etc
core is responsible for user experience
core features and configuration options should focus on users overall experience
things that are related to the actual overall output of the bar are handled by core
smart things overlaying modules themselves also end up in the core
rely on i3status color scheme
no fancy colors by default, only i3status good/degraded/bad
if we want to provide enhanced coloring, this should be a core feature
rely on the i3bar protocol
what's possible with it, we should offer, no less no more
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: