feat(cve): details page v1 parity

[kahboom]

implements #190

Changes

• Rearrange properties in Overview component to reflect v1
• Adapt labels in tables according to this guide
• Move tabs + Overview into dedicated area outside of DetailPage
• Remove DetailPage, as we are no longer using those breadcrumbs, built-in tabs, or actions

Comparison of v1 and v2

New state

TBD

• Keep or ditch the "Related Products" tab from v1
• Keep or ditch "Packages" tab from v2
• Do we want to show properties not shown (available?) in v1 ("non-normative", "CWE", "withdrawn", "released")?
• What happened to the "Reserved" property in v1, was that renamed? maybe to one of the above?

[carlosthe19916]

I think the property is cwes. And this is a mistake in the current main branch as it is rendering a string and not the value of the variable

[carlosthe19916]

Thanks for the PR @kahboom here are some minor points I noticed:

• The new Vulnerability Details page does not have the Breadcrumb to navigate to the previous page as the other pages has.
• The new Tabs have a grey background and not white as other pages. I am not saying the white one is right or wrong but perhaps we need to make an agreement on how all details pages should look like (either white or gray + any other common patterns) so all pages are consistent. We could do that in another PR surely so we don't block this PR.
• Because of the gray background there is also a grey space between the table and the bottom pagination. That doesn't look nice IMHO.

And to your questions:

Do we want to show properties not shown (available?) in v1 ("non-normative", "CWE", "withdrawn", "released")?

I don't know. I would suggest to keep that information. Show it to UX and PM, take a decision and move on.

What happened to the "Reserved" property in v1, was that renamed? maybe to one of the above?

Good question. Unfortunately, I do not know the answer. We need to ask this question to the backend guys as this is a technical thing. Perhaps the "reserved" property is now either "Modified" or "Withdrawn"

[kahboom]

@carlosthe19916 sorry for the confusion, I thought we were also wanting it to be visually the same as it was before? like this:

That's why I removed the breadcrumbs and the DetailPage etc. but I can revert that. What you showed is the SBOM "related vulnerabilities", so we should be using that same style/layout for CVEs/vulnerabilities detail as well?