Test 1.11

[svchb]

Not to be merged.

Just to give an idea if 1.11 will cause any issues.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.92%. Comparing base (16b6b5d) to head (40700a5).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #520   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.92%   69.92%           
=======================================
  Files          86       86           
  Lines        5124     5124           
=======================================
  Hits         3583     3583           
  Misses       1541     1541           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	69.92% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[svchb]

WIth beta1:

• fails oscillating_drop_2d.jl
• and the related validation case

There is a performance regression in beta1 which also effects us which causes about 30% slower execution.

[svchb]

Beta-2:

• dam_break validation fails
• oscillating drop diverges

There is a performance regression in beta1 and 2 which also effects us which causes about 30% slower execution.

[svchb]

Test Name	RC 1 (s)	1.10 (s)	Percentage Difference (%)
All Tests	2225	1757.2	-21.02
Examples	1734.4	1393.8	-19.64
Fluid	1208	1001.1	-17.11
fluid/oscillating_drop_2d.jl	53.6 (crashed)	74.1	38.25
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_2d.jl	19.2	15.6	-18.75
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_2d.jl with source term damping	15.2	12.7	-16.45
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_2d.jl with SummationDensity	19.0	15.3	-19.47
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_3d.jl	27.1	22.3	-17.71
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_3d.jl with SummationDensity	32.8	27.1	-17.38
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_edac_2d.jl	16.3	13.0	-20.25
fluid/accelerated_tank_2d.jl	15.8	13.1	-17.09
fluid/dam_break_2d.jl	32.1	23.7	-26.17
fluid/dam_break_2d.jl with KernelAbstractions.jl	25.3	18.4	-27.27
fluid/dam_break_3d.jl	21.1	17.2	-18.48
fluid/falling_water_column_2d.jl	13.5	11.0	-18.52
fluid/periodic_channel_2d.jl	21.4	18.5	-13.55
fluid/pipe_flow_2d.jl	53.6	52.7	-1.68
fluid/dam_break_2d_surface_tension.jl	83.9	71.3	-15.02
fluid/sphere_surface_tension_2d.jl	10.6	7.6	-28.30
fluid/sphere_surface_tension_3d.jl	49.6	43.4	-12.50
fluid/falling_water_spheres_2d.jl	75.9	61.6	-18.84
fluid/falling_water_spheres_3d.jl	113.3	92.7	-18.19
fluid/sphere_surface_tension_wall_2d.jl	152	132.1	-13.09
fluid/moving_wall_2d.jl	15.4	12.5	-18.83
dam_break_2d.jl with corrections	340	244	-28.24
continuity_reinit	16.1	13.2	-18.01
gradient_continuity_correction	31.6	20.4	-35.44
gradient_summation_correction	32.9	22	-33.13
no_correction	17.8	13.8	-22.47
shepard_kernel_correction	24	18.7	-22.08
blended_gradient_continuity_correction	30.4	20.1	-33.88
mixed_kernel_gradient_summation_correction	42.7	29.6	-30.68
akinci_free_surf_correction	17.9	14.6	-18.44
kernel_correction_summation_correction	29.4	21	-28.57
mixed_kernel_gradient_continuity_correction	38.4	28.9	-24.74
kernel_correction_continuity_correction	26.4	19.3	-26.89
blended_gradient_summation_correction	31.6	21.7	-31.33
Solid	21.2	12.7	-40.09
solid/oscillating_beam_2d.jl	21.2	12.7	-40.09
FSI	431.6	317.4	-26.48
fsi/falling_water_column_2d.jl	28.5	19.4	-31.93
fsi/dam_break_plate_2d.jl	59.8	47.9	-19.90
fsi/dam_break_gate_2d.jl	238.2	164.3	-31.01
fsi/falling_spheres_2d.jl	104.9	85.6	-18.40
N-Body	27.5	26.7	-2.91
n_body/n_body_solar_system.jl	5.8	4.6	-20.69
n_body/n_body_benchmark_trixi.jl	13.9	15.0	7.91
n_body/n_body_benchmark_reference.jl	3.9	3.3	-15.38
n_body/n_body_benchmark_reference_faster.jl	3.8	3.7	-2.63
Postprocessing	46.1	35.9	-22.13
postprocessing/interpolation_plane.jl	29.3	23.4	-20.14
postprocessing/interpolation_point_line.jl	2.6	2.1	-19.23
postprocessing/postprocessing.jl	14.0	10.2	-27.14
DEM	10.7	8.9	-16.82
dem/rectangular_tank_2d.jl	10.6	8.9	-16.04
Validation	479.8	354.4	-26.13
general	57.6	44.1	-23.44
oscillating_beam_2d	106.6	63.1	-40.80
dam_break_2d	315.4	247	-21.69

[efaulhaber]

Do you know where these regressions come from exactly?

[svchb]

I did not look into this any further than the CI run times. 1.11 will probably be released in August.

[svchb]

Test Category	Passed	Failed	Total	1.11 RC2 (s)	1.10.4
All Tests	149	2	151	2391.6	1841.6
Examples	128		128	1958.4	1548.6
Fluid	101		101	1450.6	1172.4
fluid/oscillating_drop_2d.jl	4		4	44.3	29.7
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_2d.jl	3		3	18.9	15.3
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_2d.jl with source term damping	3		3	14.4	12.1
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_2d.jl with SummationDensity	3		3	17.4	14.3
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_3d.jl	3		3	25.4	21.6
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_3d.jl with SummationDensity	3		3	28.8	24.0
fluid/hydrostatic_water_column_edac_2d.jl	3		3	15.1	12.4
fluid/accelerated_tank_2d.jl	3		3	15.1	12.5
fluid/dam_break_2d.jl	3		3	30.0	21.6
fluid/dam_break_oil_film_2d.jl	3		3	296.2	263.2
fluid/dam_break_2d.jl with KernelAbstractions.jl	3		3	25.0	17.6
fluid/dam_break_3d.jl	3		3	19.5	16.2
fluid/falling_water_column_2d.jl	3		3	12.1	10.5
fluid/periodic_channel_2d.jl	3		3	21.1	18.2
fluid/pipe_flow_2d.jl	3		3	54.5	54.3
fluid/dam_break_2d_surface_tension.jl	3		3	79.0	67.9
fluid/sphere_surface_tension_2d.jl	3		3	9.3	7.1
fluid/sphere_surface_tension_3d.jl	3		3	45.7	39.6
fluid/falling_water_spheres_2d.jl	3		3	76.1	60.8
fluid/falling_water_spheres_3d.jl	3		3	124.7	100.2
fluid/sphere_surface_tension_wall_2d.jl	1		1	145.1	124.9
fluid/moving_wall_2d.jl	3		3	15.7	11.9
dam_break_2d.jl with corrections	36		36	316.0	215.3
continuity_reinit	3		3	15.5	12.9
gradient_continuity_correction	3		3	27.8	18.0
gradient_summation_correction	3		3	29.8	19.8
no_correction	3		3	15.9	12.5
shepard_kernel_correction	3		3	22.6	16.7
blended_gradient_continuity_correction	3		3	27.8	18.1
mixed_kernel_gradient_summation_correction	3		3	41.6	24.9
akinci_free_surf_correction	3		3	16.3	13.2
kernel_correction_summation_correction	3		3	25.6	18.1
mixed_kernel_gradient_continuity_correction	3		3	39.8	23.9
kernel_correction_continuity_correction	3		3	24.1	17.1
blended_gradient_summation_correction	3		3	28.3	19.5
Solid	3		3	19.5	10.5
solid/oscillating_beam_2d.jl	3		3	19.5	10.5
FSI	12		12	402.0	294.2
fsi/falling_water_column_2d.jl	3		3	25.4	17.9
fsi/dam_break_plate_2d.jl	3		3	56.1	43.2
fsi/dam_break_gate_2d.jl	3		3	220.0	151.8
fsi/falling_spheres_2d.jl	3		3	100.3	81.2
N-Body	6		6	27.7	24.9
n_body/n_body_solar_system.jl	3		3	6.0	4.3
n_body/n_body_benchmark_trixi.jl	1		1	13.8	14.0
n_body/n_body_benchmark_reference.jl	1		1	3.9	3.0
n_body/n_body_benchmark_reference_faster.jl	1		1	3.8	3.4
Postprocessing	6		6	58.6	46.5
postprocessing/interpolation_plane.jl	2		2	41.9	34.6
postprocessing/interpolation_point_line.jl	2		2	2.6	2.1
postprocessing/postprocessing.jl	2		2	14.0	9.6
DEM	3		3	10.0	8.3
dem/rectangular_tank_2d.jl	3		3	9.9	8.3
Validation	18	2	20	423.1	284.6
general	4		4	41.8	31.2
oscillating_beam_2d	7		7	85.9	43.5

[svchb]

Performance regression caused by this JuliaLang/julia#55009

[efaulhaber]

In the issue they said it's probably going to get backported to 1.11.