Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding new output fields for LLM #846

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

nv-braf
Copy link
Contributor

@nv-braf nv-braf commented Mar 22, 2024

Created a new set of output fields for LLM and switch from the default to this (with unit testing) when the user specifies that the model type is LLM

@nv-braf nv-braf requested a review from tgerdesnv March 22, 2024 16:11
@nv-braf nv-braf merged commit 489e61c into use-llm-metrics-in-ma Mar 25, 2024
3 checks passed
nv-braf added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
nv-braf added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
* New Records for LLM metrics (#839)

* Adding new LLM metrics

* Adding base class for perf, inter_token, and time_to_first latency records

* Add --llm-mode option (#842)

* Adding CLI hook for LLM

* Changing to use --model-type

* Capture LLM metrics from genai-perf in MA (#844)

* Successfully reading from LLM CSV

* General cleanup

* All unit tests passing

* Fixing metric table typos

* Fixing typos

* Update constraints for LLMs (#845)

* Adding LLM values to list of possible constraints

* Fixing typo

* Adding new output fields for LLM (#846)

* Profiling model using genai-perf (#849)

* Initial changes to run genai-perf in MA

* Gating call to get LLM records

* Fixing captilization issue

* Removing debug

* Adding TODO

---------

Co-authored-by: root <[email protected]>

* Add genai_perf CLI options to MA (#854)

* Added support for genai_perf CLI

* Remove dead code

* Removing genai_perf collateral

* Fixing codeQL issue

* Adding streaming to genai_perf_config

---------

Co-authored-by: root <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants