Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

buildreport_parser: Add Depex section parsing #460

Merged

Conversation

Javagedes
Copy link
Contributor

Updates the buildreport parser to also parse the depex section instead of skipping it.

@Javagedes Javagedes added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 27, 2023
Updates the buildreport parser to also parse the depex section instead
of skipping it.
@Javagedes Javagedes force-pushed the buildreport_parser-depex-support branch from 619738c to 85f3866 Compare November 27, 2023 23:31
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (edd06b3) 81.19% compared to head (cc5b5b2) 81.19%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #460   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.19%   81.19%           
=======================================
  Files          57       57           
  Lines        7358     7358           
=======================================
  Hits         5974     5974           
  Misses       1384     1384           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Javagedes Javagedes requested a review from makubacki November 27, 2023 23:34
@Javagedes Javagedes merged commit cadd3f2 into tianocore:master Dec 4, 2023
12 checks passed
@Javagedes Javagedes deleted the buildreport_parser-depex-support branch December 4, 2023 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants