Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tools: Testbench: Add IPC4 support #9483

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator

@singalsu singalsu commented Sep 17, 2024

This PR replaces #9025. The IPC3 and IPC4 testbench versions can be now build from same sources by selecting CONFIG_IPC_MAJOR_3=y or CONFIG_IPC_MAJOR_4=n.

The IPC4 testbench version can use e.g. topologies sof-hda-benchmark-comp<16/24/32>.tplg from tools/build_tools/topology/topology2/development.

The IPC3 testbench version is similar as before but cleaned up a bit.

tools/testbench/topology_ipc4.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tools/testbench/topology_ipc4.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tools/testbench/topology_ipc4.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@lgirdwood lgirdwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good except for the variable array build fix patch.

src/ipc/ipc4/handler.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/include/ipc4/header.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@singalsu singalsu marked this pull request as draft September 18, 2024 16:45
src/ipc/ipc4/handler.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tools/testbench/common_test.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tools/testbench/common_test_ipc4.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
return -EINVAL;
}

/* TODO 44.1 kHz like rates */
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make a bug for this, orphaned todos in code are useless

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that's something I have not yet been able to test, 44.1 kHz capability is very useful so it won't be orphaned. Also seems that copier in/out formats parsing is not complete, only 1st format is working (S32_LE) so even basic S16_LE fails with the topologies I used.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This and next one remain still opens in the version of today. I will address them later when I find suitable topologies to use and have found fix for copier formats discovery.

tp->config[0].format = tp->frame_fmt;
tp->period_size = 2 * krate;

/* TODO used for what? determine from topology and enabled pipelines if need */
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lgirdwood do you know what this is for?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a feature from SOF plugin, I'm not sure I need this. Maybe need if I with testbench -pA,B,C,.. command line switch select pipelines those are not connected to 1st PCM. I need to test with other topologies, e.g. sof-hda-generic that has more pipelines.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ranj063 do we still need this as an open or can we remove the comment/fix ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@singalsu with the plugin, the pipelines are determined based on just the PCM ID for the device that we want to start playback/capture on. I suppose this is not needed for the testbench because we only have 1 pipeline in your test topology and you want to set up all the widgets anyway.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for explanation! I'll keep it for now for possible more complex scenarios. But I will need to update the PCM ID based on the command line specified pipelines.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@singalsu maybe add that explanation from @ranj063 as a comment here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

Copy link
Member

@cujomalainey cujomalainey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve for google owned code, unresolved comments are nit

@singalsu singalsu marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2024 16:11
tools/testbench/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Some pause/resume fails with https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR9483/build8235/devicetest/index.html and https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR9483/build8233/devicetest/index.html . Unlikely related. But I'll still fix that typo and add to README.md how to run debugger (ddd) with xtensa xt-gdb target.

Copy link
Collaborator

@kv2019i kv2019i left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent stuff @singalsu ! Only very minor comments, but if you do a update, please take a look. You can keep the one valgrind find in the series, given it's only one commit in the series, others seem to be strictly related to enabling IPC4 testbench.

@@ -1615,7 +1615,7 @@ void ipc_cmd(struct ipc_cmd_hdr *_hdr)
/* FW sends an ipc message to host if request bit is clear */
if (in->primary.r.rsp == SOF_IPC4_MESSAGE_DIR_MSG_REQUEST) {
struct ipc *ipc = ipc_get();
struct ipc4_message_reply reply;
struct ipc4_message_reply reply = {{0}};
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This kind of stuff could have been in a separate PR btw.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can take it to separate if this review pass takes longer than few days.

@@ -0,0 +1,1304 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
//
// Copyright(c) 2018-2024 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@singalsu For new files, please drop the "All rights reserved."

memcpy(msg, module_init, sizeof(*module_init));
memcpy(msg + sizeof(*module_init), comp_info->ipc_payload, comp_info->ipc_size);

// TODO
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO what?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, it's from time when I didn't have IPC simulation, just remove these.

msg.primary.r.instance_id = pipe_info->instance_id;
msg.primary.r.ppl_mem_size = pipe_info->mem_usage;

// TODO
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto, TODO what? And why C++ comments?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same, I'm lazy to type, and // is easy to search :)

out:
/* free all data */

// TODO: Check this
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, maybe a bit more verbose if we leave this to codebase as a TODO..?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is remaining from some old code change try and I've forgot to clean it up. It's clear that ctx->tplg_base should be freed. It was was also missing from above load widget.

* Much faster than real-time execution in native build, e.g. x86 on
Linux for efficient validation usage.
* With xtensa DSP build offers cycles accurate simulated environment
execution. And also with options for similation speed vs. model
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo: similation

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep

Warnings are errors in testbench build. This change avoids error:

sof/src/ipc/ipc4/helper.c:761:19:
error: unused function 'process_dma_index' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
This addition allows to load file components for DAI
and host copier replacement for testbench. DC blocker
is added as process component to allow testing of this
component as example. Support for other processing
components will need a new solution to pass the UUIDs
over IPC messages instead of the 8-bit index value.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
Components initialize in testbench needs these headers. Adding
these allows load of to the components when found in topology.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
The crossover_init_output_pins() function is changed to static.
This change avoids build error:

sof/src/audio/crossover/crossover_ipc4.c:32:5:
error: no previous prototype for ‘crossover_init_output_pins’
[-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
The build of testbench IPC4 with xt-clang fails with this error:

sof/src/audio/tdfb/tdfb_ipc4.c:31:37: error:
field 'module_data' with variable sized type
'struct sof_ipc4_notify_module_data' not at the end of a struct or
class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]

sof/src/audio/tdfb/tdfb_ipc4.c:32:38: error:
field 'control_msg' with variable sized type
'struct sof_ipc4_control_msg_payload' not at the end of a struct or
class is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]

The issue is fixed with use of struct pointers to IPC message
msg_module_data and msg_payload to prepare the message template.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
The remove of variables in1 and out1 in peakvolume HiFi4
function vol_s16_to_s16() avoids testbench IPC4 build error:

sof/src/audio/volume/volume_hifi4_with_peakvol.c:406:10:
error: unused variable 'in1' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable]

sof/src/audio/volume/volume_hifi4_with_peakvol.c:407:10:
error: unused variable 'out1' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable]

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
This change prepares to add IPC4 support to testbench.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
Prefix macros with TB and add TESTBENCH to headers single time
include control macros. Especially ifndef _TRACE_H is in risk
to conflict with possible other headers.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
@singalsu singalsu force-pushed the testbench_ipc4_take2 branch 2 times, most recently from 43f347b to d7af1af Compare September 23, 2024 16:56

list_for_item_safe(item, _item, &tp->pcm_list) {
pcm_info = container_of(item, struct tplg_pcm_info, item);
list_item_del(&pcm_info->item);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can just do list_item_del(item) but the above is essentially the same

schedule_free(0);
schedulers = arch_schedulers_get();
list_for_item_safe(slist, _slist, &(*schedulers)->list) {
sch = container_of(slist, struct schedule_data, list);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here actually - should this be removed from the list?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

int err;

/* remove the components for this pipeline */
list_for_item_safe(clist, temp, &sof_get()->ipc->comp_list) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete list item?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This list item can't be deleted yet.

struct file_comp_data *fcd;

/* set the test limits for this pipeline */
list_for_item_safe(clist, temp, &sof_get()->ipc->comp_list) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here no list items are removed or moved or added, so it doesn't need to be "safe?"

The helper functions are moved from testbench.c to common_test.c
and common_test_ipc3.c as preparation to add IPC4 support.

The file components are looked up in test setup to arrays to ease
finding them in test run and control ending the test.

The parse string for command getopt() is fixed to match the
supported options.

The testbench parameter struct is changed to dynamically allocated
and zeroed by calloc(). It also avoids issues found with valgrind
about uninitialized.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
This change avoids a segfault. Topologies may contain
non-supported PCMs such as HDMI and if pipelines are not
restricted with -p A,B,C,.. option file might get set up
without filename.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
This patch adds topology parsing and common functions versions
for IPC4.

Due to dai_get_init_delay_ms() implementation in IPC4 build
the file component is changed internally to copier to provide
the DAI data struct. The change is common for both IPC3 and IPC4
though copier is not usually used with IPC3 systems. Since it
works the same solution is used. The file state retrieve is changed
because the file component data is placed deeper into the
structures.

Due to IPC4 scheduling of pipelines the file component is added
a timeout. A file component sets timeout status if there has
been three copy operations with no data to process. The timeout
and EOF are used to end cleanly the test run.

The library_defconfig still has CONFIG_IPC_MAJOR_4=n. The add
of build type select to scripts/rebuild-testbench.sh is further
work. Also the IPC4 testbench in this state is not well usable
with only one component supported as process component and
without byte control set up algorithms.

Test run with DC blocker is possible this way:

tools/testbench/build_testbench/install/bin/testbench
  -r 48000 -R 48000 -c 2 -n 2 -b S32_LE -p 1,2
  -t tools/build_tools/topology/topology2/development/
  sof-hda-benchmark-dcblock32.tplg
  -i in.raw -o out.raw

Also sof-hda-benchmark-gain32.tplg can be run.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
The utils is a better description of the purpose of the functions
in these files. There's no change to functionality.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
This text add helps with various usages for testbench.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <[email protected]>
schedule_free(0);
schedulers = arch_schedulers_get();
list_for_item_safe(slist, _slist, &(*schedulers)->list) {
sch = container_of(slist, struct schedule_data, list);
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

} else {
fprintf(stderr, "error: no filename set\n");
goto error;
}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note for reviewers, this is a new commit and change that I added after I saw that I could still segfault this.

ret = tb_set_up_widget(tp, current_comp_info);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried this change for this and next function but I got problems with run of sof-hda-benchmark-dcblock32.tplg with all four pipelines.

if (route_info->source != current_comp_info)
continue;

/* Widgets will be freed when the pipeline is deleted, so just unbind modules */
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer to leave these as is and copy later from sof plugin new versions if these can be improved. Right now the logic of these doesn't feel clear to me.

@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lyakh @kv2019i Thanks for review, I hope I have now addressed or at least tried all your suggestions for improvements, so proposing a new round now. This versions passes my ipc3 and ipc4 check runs. I submit after this a PR that allows load other components than now (host, dai, pga, dcblock) with UUID based component load.

Copy link
Collaborator

@lyakh lyakh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the QB failure needs to be checked

@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

the QB failure needs to be checked

Yep, updownmixer on PTL FPGA fails, " pipe: pipeline_copy: pipe:0 0x0 pipeline_copy(): ret = -61, start->comp.id = 65540, dir = 1", in https://sof-ci.01.org/sof-pr-viewer/#/build/PR9483/build14242452 . I'll retry.

@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

SOFCI TEST

@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Some pause/resume issues in https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR9483/build8324/devicetest/index.html but unlikely related to this.

@lgirdwood lgirdwood merged commit e5a2746 into thesofproject:main Oct 1, 2024
44 of 47 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants