-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Batch execution refactor #2186
Batch execution refactor #2186
Conversation
} | ||
ec.blockEndResult = onBlockTxResult | ||
ec.blockEndResult.MarkSynthetic(true) | ||
// todo - stefan not clear what this does |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some paranoia checks I've added; Not sure if we really need them
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, dont see anything wrong;
args = append(args, senders[i]) // sender_address | ||
args = append(args, i) // idx | ||
args = append(args, senderIds[i]) // sender_address | ||
args = append(args, fromIdx+i) // idx |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I take it this was wrong value previously
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure about the offsets that were passed to the tx execution either
Why this change is needed
To help fix a bug that returns phantom events.
What changes were made as part of this PR
receipt.tx
to the transaction table, because now wePR checks pre-merging
Please indicate below by ticking the checkbox that you have read and performed the required
PR checks