Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2 proposals + schedule constraints #1727

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2024
Merged

2 proposals + schedule constraints #1727

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

erights
Copy link
Contributor

@erights erights commented Oct 30, 2024

Immutable ArrayBuffers for stage 2
Stabilize for stage 1 with links coming
Schedule constraints: I will likely miss Monday

@erights erights requested a review from ljharb October 30, 2024 20:28
@erights erights self-assigned this Oct 30, 2024
Immutable ArrayBuffers for stage 2
Stabilize for stage 1 with links coming
Schedule constraints: I will likely miss Monday
@ctcpip ctcpip merged commit 165ae1a into main Oct 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@ctcpip ctcpip deleted the erights-patch-1 branch October 30, 2024 20:47
@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ When applicable, use these emoji as a prefix to the agenda item topic.
|:-----:|:-------:|-------|-----------|
| 3 | 5m | [Intl.DurationFormat](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format) Correct spec bug resulting in fraction digits and rounding mode options being ignored. ([PR](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format/pull/203/)) | Ben Allen |
| 2.7 | 15m | [`Error.isError](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-is-error/issues/7) to stage 3? | Jordan Harband |
| 1 | 30m | [Immutable ArrayBuffer](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-immutable-arraybuffer) to stage 2? | Mark Miller |
| 0 | 60m | Stabilize (link TBD) to stage 1? | Mark Miller |
Copy link

@slorber slorber Nov 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 what is this Stabilize thing?

Is this some kind of built-in interning, possibly an alternative to Records & Tuples value semantics?
tc39/proposal-record-tuple#387

cc @acutmore any idea?


Edit: found a link, doesn't look related: https://github.com/Agoric/proposal-stabilize

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that is indeed the link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants