Fixes indentation for tracking key to be nested under montecarlo key in YAML

[Sonu0305]

📝 Description

Type: 🪲 bugfix | 📝 documentation

Fixed indentation in docs\io\output\how_to_rpacket_tracking.ipynb to correct the structure of YAML,
i.e. the tracking key should be nested under montecarlo key.

Closes #2480

📌 Resources

Examples, notebooks, and links to useful references.

🚦 Testing

How did you test these changes?

• Testing pipeline
• Other method (describe)
• My changes can't be tested (explain why)

☑️ Checklist

• I requested two reviewers for this pull request
• I updated the documentation according to my changes
• I built the documentation by applying the build_docs label

Note: If you are not allowed to perform any of these actions, ping (@) a contributor.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran ruff on the latest commit (5b7827a).
Here are the outputs produced.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Summarised output:

1	W291	[*] Trailing whitespace

Complete output(might be large):

docs/io/output/how_to_rpacket_tracking.ipynb:cell 12:1:62: W291 [*] Trailing whitespace
Found 1 error.
[*] 1 fixable with the `--fix` option.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.03%. Comparing base (2a06fdf) to head (5b7827a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2946      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.39%   70.03%   -0.36%     
==========================================
  Files         222      222              
  Lines       16157    16157              
==========================================
- Hits        11373    11316      -57     
- Misses       4784     4841      +57     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*

Hi, human.

The docs workflow has succeeded ✔️

Click here to see your results.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (2a06fdf) and the latest commit (5b7827a).
Here are the logs produced by ASV.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.

Significantly changed benchmarks:

All benchmarks:

Benchmarks that have stayed the same:

| Change   | Before [2a06fdfb] <master>   | After [5b7827a9]    | Ratio   | Benchmark (Parameter)                                                                                                               |
|----------|------------------------------|---------------------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | 3.12±0.6μs                   | 5.50±1μs            | ~1.77   | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket_within_shell                              |
|          | 41.9±30μs                    | 46.4±20μs           | ~1.11   | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_line_emission                                         |
|          | 1.77±0.3μs                   | 1.58±0.4μs          | ~0.89   | transport_geometry_calculate_distances.BenchmarkTransportGeometryCalculateDistances.time_calculate_distance_line                    |
|          | 55.1±30μs                    | 45.1±20μs           | ~0.82   | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_line_scatter                                          |
|          | 3.18±0.01ms                  | 2.56±0ms            | ~0.81   | opacities_opacity_state.BenchmarkOpacitiesOpacityState.time_opacity_state_initialize('scatter')                                     |
|          | 10.9±2μs                     | 6.41±0.6μs          | ~0.59   | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket                                           |
|          | 7.49±2μs                     | 8.02±2μs            | 1.07    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket_volley                                    |
|          | 22.6±6μs                     | 24.0±6μs            | 1.06    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_generate_rpacket_last_interaction_tracker_list |
|          | 731±0.9ns                    | 764±2ns             | 1.05    | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_thomson_scatter                                       |
|          | 611±100ns                    | 631±100ns           | 1.03    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_photoabsorption_opacity_calculation                              |
|          | 37.8±0.1μs                   | 38.8±0.03μs         | 1.03    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_generate_rpacket_tracker_list                  |
|          | 2.53±0.4ms                   | 2.60±0.4ms          | 1.03    | transport_montecarlo_single_packet_loop.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloSinglePacketLoop.time_single_packet_loop                        |
|          | 1.18±0μs                     | 1.21±0μs            | 1.02    | transport_geometry_calculate_distances.BenchmarkTransportGeometryCalculateDistances.time_calculate_distance_boundary                |
|          | 2.09±0m                      | 2.08±0m             | 1.00    | spectrum_formal_integral.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloFormalIntegral.time_FormalIntegrator_functions                                 |
|          | 1.66±0.02ms                  | 1.66±0.01ms         | 1.00    | transport_montecarlo_main_loop.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloMontecarloMainLoop.time_montecarlo_main_loop                             |
|          | 39.0±0.2s                    | 38.5±0.01s          | 0.99    | run_tardis.BenchmarkRunTardis.time_run_tardis                                                                                       |
|          | 1.05±0m                      | 1.04±0m             | 0.99    | run_tardis.BenchmarkRunTardis.time_run_tardis_rpacket_tracking                                                                      |
|          | 208±0.3ns                    | 205±0.2ns           | 0.98    | spectrum_formal_integral.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloFormalIntegral.time_intensity_black_body                                       |
|          | 2.29±2μs                     | 2.22±2μs            | 0.97    | transport_montecarlo_estimators_radfield_estimator_calcs.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaPacket.time_update_line_estimators       |
|          | 65.3±0.1ms                   | 63.6±0.1ms          | 0.97    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_rpacket_trackers_to_dataframe                  |
|          | 611±100ns                    | 581±200ns           | 0.95    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_pair_creation_opacity_calculation                                |
|          | 3.92±0.01ms                  | 3.74±0ms            | 0.95    | opacities_opacity_state.BenchmarkOpacitiesOpacityState.time_opacity_state_initialize('macroatom')                                   |
|          | 3.15±0.3μs                   | 3.00±0.4μs          | 0.95    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_bad_vpacket                                       |
|          | 581±100ns                    | 531±100ns           | 0.91    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_compton_opacity_calculation                                      |

If you want to see the graph of the results, you can check it here

[Sonu0305]

Hi @andrewfullard @atharva-2001 @jvshields ,
Could you please review when you have a chance, Thank You.

[Sonu0305]

Hi @andrewfullard ,
Can the GSoC label be applied to this PR too?
Thank you for helping.