Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lazy scan #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2024
Merged

Lazy scan #166

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2024

Conversation

joelittlejohn
Copy link
Collaborator

@joelittlejohn joelittlejohn commented Aug 5, 2023

Adding this as a draft PR for now. I wrote this last year and I seem to remember that there was still something to work out around the tests proving that the lazy seq was not being realised. Can't remember if I resolved this or not.

@joelittlejohn joelittlejohn marked this pull request as draft August 5, 2023 17:24
@joelittlejohn joelittlejohn changed the title Lazy scan WIP Lazy scan Aug 5, 2023
@joelittlejohn joelittlejohn force-pushed the lazy-scan branch 2 times, most recently from 31e863f to 3e6ad9b Compare April 2, 2024 17:04
@joelittlejohn joelittlejohn marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2024 17:06
@joelittlejohn joelittlejohn requested a review from kipz April 2, 2024 17:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@kipz kipz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I have one of these that looks very similar! :)

Scanning with this function does not use span-reqs, but instead creates
a lazy sequence and issues requests to get additional pages of data
only when needed.
@joelittlejohn joelittlejohn merged commit e5e2a99 into master Jun 1, 2024
12 checks passed
@joelittlejohn joelittlejohn deleted the lazy-scan branch June 1, 2024 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants