refactor: drop check_identity from ExecutionSpec

[ssddOnTop]

Fixes: #1414
/claim 1414

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Enhanced HTTP IO capabilities to support more robust network operations.
  • Added a call to enable_all() method before building the runtime to improve HTTP IO functionality.
• Bug Fixes
  • Improved the document processing to exclude empty directives, ensuring cleaner and more accurate outputs.
• Refactor
  • Optimized the print_directives function to filter out empty directive strings for a more streamlined output.
  • Introduced a new constant NONEMPTY_DIRECTIVES for checking non-empty directive values.
  • Updated the print_directive function to conditionally return an empty string based on NONEMPTY_DIRECTIVES.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent updates aim to enhance functionality and optimize code efficiency. Changes in the codebase include refining the print_directives function in document.rs to remove empty strings and implement filtering for specific directive names. Additionally, in main.rs, an enable_all() method call is introduced to activate HTTP IO before creating the runtime, improving network operations setup.

Changes

File(s)	Summary of Changes
src/document.rs	Improved print_directives by filtering out empty strings and adding directive name filtering with NONEMPTY_DIRECTIVES.
src/main.rs	Added enable_all() method call to enable HTTP IO before building the runtime.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.65217% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.58%. Comparing base (0f46776) to head (52e2b2f).
Report is 105 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 52e2b2f differs from pull request most recent head 8d6f143. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8d6f143 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/main.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1726      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.90%   86.58%   -0.33%     
==========================================
  Files         155      155              
  Lines       15568    15559       -9     
==========================================
- Hits        13530    13472      -58     
- Misses       2038     2087      +49     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tusharmath]

We shouldn't require reordering of fields and type while performing the identity test. Modify print_schema to take in options from the user to make it configurable.

[github-actions]

Action required: PR inactive for 2 days.
Status update or closure in 5 days.

[github-actions]

Action required: PR inactive for 2 days.
Status update or closure in 5 days.

[github-actions]

Action required: PR inactive for 2 days.
Status update or closure in 5 days.

[github-actions]

Action required: PR inactive for 2 days.
Status update or closure in 5 days.

[github-actions]

PR closed after 5 days of inactivity.

[ssddOnTop]

closing in favor of #1850