Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Amend gendered language #1038

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

erinmgraham
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #838

Replaced he/she/him/her/his/hers with they/them/their/theirs to be more inclusive.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2024

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/swcarpentry/git-novice/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-1038

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 02-setup.md    |  6 +++---
 03-create.md   |  6 +++---
 05-history.md  | 14 +++++++-------
 07-github.md   | 12 ++++++------
 08-collab.md   | 16 ++++++++--------
 09-conflict.md |  8 ++++----
 md5sum.txt     | 12 ++++++------
 7 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2024-11-03 07:12:31 +0000

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2024
@martinosorb
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Erin. To my ears, Alfredo sounds like a masculine name, and Jennifer like a feminine name. So using 'they/them' with these two is a bit unnatural and distracting to me. Personally, I would keep he and she for these. The changes make total sense when it comes to the Owner and Collaborator in Episode 8.
We could also change Jimmy to another female (or gender-unspecified) character in Episode 3 for more balance, or even change Alfredo's name, but I wouldn't use they with a clearly masculine name...

@erinmgraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

erinmgraham commented Nov 4, 2024 via email

@martinosorb
Copy link
Contributor

Jules and Ren could be ok, although we lose the funnyness of Alfredo Linguini as a name. Any thoughts from @dpshelio?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Amending Gendered Language in Episode 8
2 participants