Fix royalty redundancies #173
Conversation
Spablob
requested review from
kingster-will,
Ramarti,
leeren,
jdubpark,
LeoHChen and
AndyBoWu
as code owners
WalkthroughThe latest update to the RoyaltyModule and related test files focuses on refining the handling of license royalty logic and enhancing code readability. Specifically, it removes certain conditional checks in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
contracts/modules/royalty/RoyaltyModule.sol (1)
Line range hint
114-130: This function handles royalty payments securely by checking several conditions like whitelisting and IP tagging. However, there's a potential performance improvement by cachingDISPUTE_MODULEoutside the if condition.- IDisputeModule dispute = DISPUTE_MODULE; - if (dispute.isIpTagged(receiverIpId) || dispute.isIpTagged(payerIpId)) + IDisputeModule dispute = DISPUTE_MODULE; + if (dispute.isIpTagged(receiverIpId) || dispute.isIpTagged(payerIpId))
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- contracts/modules/royalty/RoyaltyModule.sol (1 hunks)
- contracts/modules/royalty/policies/RoyaltyPolicyLAP.sol (1 hunks)
- test/foundry/modules/royalty/RoyaltyModule.t.sol (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- contracts/modules/royalty/policies/RoyaltyPolicyLAP.sol
- test/foundry/modules/royalty/RoyaltyModule.t.sol
Additional comments not posted (17)
contracts/modules/royalty/RoyaltyModule.sol (17)
Line range hint
1-1: Solid use of SPDX identifier for clear licensing.
Line range hint
3-11: Good practice importing only necessary libraries and interfaces to keep the contract clean and efficient.
Line range hint
17-17: The documentation is clear and provides a good overview of the contract's purpose.
Line range hint
30-39: The constructor correctly checks for zero addresses, preventing potential deployment errors. Excellent use of custom errors for better error handling.
Line range hint
41-47: Proper initialization of inherited contracts ensures that all functionalities are set up correctly.
Line range hint
49-51: Effective use of a modifier to restrict function access to the licensing module. This enhances security by ensuring only authorized calls.
Line range hint
53-60: Good implementation of the whitelist functionality for royalty policies. Ensuring the address is not zero before whitelisting is a crucial check.
Line range hint
62-69: Similar to royalty policies, the whitelisting of tokens is handled securely. Proper validation checks are in place.
Line range hint
71-88: The logic here ensures that only whitelisted policies can be used, which is crucial for maintaining integrity in royalty transactions. The detailed comments help in understanding the complex conditions.
Line range hint
90-112: The function handles the linking of IP assets to their parents with royalty policies. It includes necessary checks to ensure compatibility of royalty policies among linked IPs, which is vital for consistent royalty behavior across derived assets.
Line range hint
132-144: Ensures that all necessary checks are made before processing a license minting fee payment. The usage of custom errors for different failure scenarios is commendable.
Line range hint
146-146: Good implementation of view functions for checking whitelisting status. These are essential for external queries and integrations.
Line range hint
148-148: Another view function well implemented for external integrations.
Line range hint
150-150: Proper external view function for fetching royalty policies associated with an IP asset. This is crucial for external audits and checks.
Line range hint
152-152: Solid implementation of thesupportsInterfacemethod, ensuring compliance with the ERC165 standard.
Line range hint
154-154: Secure handling of contract upgrades by restricting to authorized personnel.
Line range hint
156-160: Efficient access to internal storage using assembly. This is a low-level operation that needs careful handling, and it's done correctly here.
Description
Removes redundant checks from royalty related contracts
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
RoyaltyModulecontract to simplify royalty checking logic.Style
_initPolicyfunction of theRoyaltyPolicyLAPcontract.Tests
test_RoyaltyModule_payLicenseMintingFee_revert_IpIsTaggedto streamline the testing process.