Update PILicenseTemplate for Compatibility Checks of derivativesReciprocal
#157
Conversation
kingster-will
requested review from
Ramarti,
leeren,
jdubpark,
Spablob,
LeoHChen and
AndyBoWu
as code owners
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve renaming the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- contracts/interfaces/modules/licensing/IPILicenseTemplate.sol (1 hunks)
- contracts/lib/PILFlavors.sol (4 hunks)
- contracts/modules/licensing/PILicenseTemplate.sol (2 hunks)
- test/foundry/LicenseToken.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/foundry/integration/big-bang/SingleNftCollection.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/foundry/modules/licensing/LicensingModule.t.sol (9 hunks)
- test/foundry/modules/licensing/PILicenseTemplate.t.sol (2 hunks)
- test/foundry/utils/LicensingHelper.t.sol (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- test/foundry/LicenseToken.t.sol
- test/foundry/integration/big-bang/SingleNftCollection.t.sol
Additional comments not posted (7)
contracts/modules/licensing/PILicenseTemplate.sol (1)
225-225: RenamingmintingFeetodefaultMintingFeeingetRoyaltyPolicyand adding a compatibility check forderivativesReciprocalenhance clarity and enforce licensing rules.Also applies to: 466-466
Verification successful
The search results indicate that the
derivativesReciprocalvariable is used in multiple places within thePILicenseTemplate.solandIPILicenseTemplate.solfiles. This confirms that the compatibility check forderivativesReciprocalhas been implemented correctly.
contracts/modules/licensing/PILicenseTemplate.sol: Multiple instances ofderivativesReciprocalusage.contracts/interfaces/modules/licensing/IPILicenseTemplate.sol: Definition and documentation ofderivativesReciprocal.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new compatibility check for `derivativesReciprocal`. # Test: Search for the usage of `derivativesReciprocal` in licensing modules. Expect: Correct implementation. rg --type solidity $'derivativesReciprocal' --glob '*LicenseTemplate.sol'Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new compatibility check for `derivativesReciprocal`. # Test: Search for the usage of `derivativesReciprocal` in licensing modules. Expect: Correct implementation. rg --type solidity --glob '*LicenseTemplate.sol' 'derivativesReciprocal'Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new compatibility check for `derivativesReciprocal`. # Test: Search for the usage of `derivativesReciprocal` in licensing modules. Expect: Correct implementation. rg --glob '*LicenseTemplate.sol' 'derivativesReciprocal'Length of output: 1091
test/foundry/modules/licensing/PILicenseTemplate.t.sol (2)
264-264: Ensure the updated variable namedefaultMintingFeeis used consistently.
421-436: Verify the logic for checking compatibility of licenses.Verification successful
The
verifyCompatibleLicensesfunction is defined in multiple places, includingPILicenseTemplate.sol,ILicenseTemplate.sol, andMockLicenseTemplate.sol. It is also tested extensively inPILicenseTemplate.t.sol.
PILicenseTemplate.sol:183: Definition ofverifyCompatibleLicenses.ILicenseTemplate.sol:122: Interface definition ofverifyCompatibleLicenses.MockLicenseTemplate.sol:63: Mock implementation ofverifyCompatibleLicenses.PILicenseTemplate.t.sol: Multiple assertions testingverifyCompatibleLicenses.The extensive testing in
PILicenseTemplate.t.solsuggests that the logic for checking compatibility of licenses is well-covered.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic for checking compatibility of licenses, especially for commercial remix terms. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of compatibility checks. rg --type solidity $'verifyCompatibleLicenses'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic for checking compatibility of licenses, especially for commercial remix terms. # Search for the definition of the verifyCompatibleLicenses function in Solidity files ast-grep --lang solidity --pattern 'function verifyCompatibleLicenses($_) { $$$ }' # Search for the usage of the verifyCompatibleLicenses function in Solidity files rg 'verifyCompatibleLicenses' --type solidityLength of output: 280
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic for checking compatibility of licenses, especially for commercial remix terms. # Find all Solidity files and search for the definition of the verifyCompatibleLicenses function fd -e sol -x grep -Hn 'function verifyCompatibleLicenses' {} # Find all Solidity files and search for the usage of the verifyCompatibleLicenses function fd -e sol -x grep -Hn 'verifyCompatibleLicenses' {}Length of output: 2187
test/foundry/modules/licensing/LicensingModule.t.sol (4)
178-178: Ensure thedefaultMintingFeeis correctly set to 0 as per the PR objectives.
742-742: Review the handling ofexpiredTermsIdacross multiple test cases to ensure consistency and correct behavior in expiration scenarios.Also applies to: 749-749, 765-765, 785-785, 806-806, 814-814
422-422: Confirm that thedefaultMintingFeeis intended to be 0 in this context, especially given the significant implications for licensing terms.Verification successful
The
defaultMintingFeeis consistently set to 0 across multiple instances in the codebase. This suggests that the value of 0 is intentional and consistent with the licensing terms.
- Instances found where
defaultMintingFeeis set to 0:
- Multiple occurrences in Solidity files.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the defaultMintingFee is consistently set to 0 across all licensing terms in the codebase. # Test: Search for the defaultMintingFee setting in all licensing terms. Expect: Consistent value of 0. rg --type solidity $'defaultMintingFee: 0'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the defaultMintingFee is consistently set to 0 across all licensing terms in the codebase. # Test: Search for the defaultMintingFee setting in all licensing terms. Expect: Consistent value of 0. rg --type solidity $'defaultMintingFee: 0'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the defaultMintingFee is consistently set to 0 across all licensing terms in the codebase. # Find all Solidity files and search for the defaultMintingFee setting within them. fd -e sol -x rg 'defaultMintingFee: 0' {}Length of output: 367
964-964: ThedefaultMintingFeeis set to 0 in various scenarios involving different licensing terms. Ensure this is consistent with the intended business logic, especially considering the potential financial implications.Also applies to: 1013-1013, 1060-1060
|
TRST-H2 |
Description
This PR includes changes that update the
PILicenseTemplatecontract. The contract now checks that alllicenseTermsIdsare the same ifderivativesReciprocalis true when checking compatibility between license terms. Additionally, the term "mintingFee" has been renamed to "defaultMintingFee" to reflect that the minting fee defined in the license terms can be overridden by the IP Owner for a specific IP Asset.Changes:
Updated the
PILicenseTemplatecontract to include a check forlicenseTermsIdscompatibility. IfderivativesReciprocalis true, alllicenseTermsIdsmust be the same. This change ensures that the compatibility between license terms is correctly enforced.Renamed the term "mintingFee" to "defaultMintingFee" in the
PILicenseTemplatecontract. This change reflects that the minting fee defined in the license terms can be overridden by the IP Owner for a specific IP Asset, providing more flexibility in the licensing process.Test Plan
Updated the unit tests to reflect these changes, and also add new tests to cover the code changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit
mintingFeetodefaultMintingFeeacross various contracts and tests for consistency.