-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhancement of isValidSigner
Function in IPAccount
#148
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM + Approved by auditors
WalkthroughThe updates enhance the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant IPAccount
participant ERC6551
participant IIPAccount
User->>IPAccount: call isValidSigner(address, data)
IPAccount->>ERC6551: validate signer
ERC6551-->>IPAccount: validation result
IPAccount->>IIPAccount: notify on validation
IIPAccount-->>IPAccount: acknowledgment
User->>IPAccount: validation result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- contracts/IPAccountImpl.sol (4 hunks)
- test/foundry/IPAccount.t.sol (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
contracts/IPAccountImpl.sol (1)
Line range hint
99-105
: Security Review ofisValidSigner
Overload FunctionThe function correctly handles edge cases for the
data
length and performs permission checks using theAccessController
. This robust handling ensures that only valid signers can execute actions, which is crucial for the security of the protocol.Consider adding detailed comments explaining the significance of the
selector
extraction and its role in permission checks, as this could enhance the maintainability and clarity of the code.+ // Extract the first 4 bytes of data as the function selector for permission checks if (data.length >= 4) { selector = bytes4(data[:4]); }
test/foundry/IPAccount.t.sol (1)
119-146
: Review of New Test Functions forisValidSigner
The new test functions
test_IPAccount_isValidSigner
andtest_IPAccount_isValidSigner_revert_InvalidInputs
are crucial for ensuring that the enhancedisValidSigner
functionality behaves as expected under various conditions. These tests cover scenarios including owner validation, data encoding, and permission checks.It's essential to ensure that these tests cover all edge cases, especially for the new data encoding functionality. Consider adding more tests if any scenarios are not yet covered.
d7fdb98
to
bd88431
Compare
Description
This PR includes changes that enhance the
isValidSigner
function inherited from the ERC6551 standard. The function now not only checks whether the signer is the owner of the IPAccount, but also queries and checks whether the signer is valid to execute a transaction on behalf of the IPAccount on a specific recipient address with specific calldata.Changes:
Modified the
isValidSigner
function to allow the caller to encode the recipient address and calldata into thedata
parameter. This change enables the function to check or query whether a signer has valid permission to perform a specific action on behalf of the IPAccount before really executing the action.Test Plan
Updated the unit tests to reflect these changes.
100% unit test coverage of changed code.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests