Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Set custom release suffix for Packit #422

Merged

Conversation

vojtechtrefny
Copy link
Member

We want a high release number (99) for the daily builds done by Packit to make sure the Copr daily builds are always newer than the version in Fedora. We can do this in Packit config instead of bumping the release in the spec everytime.

Copy link

Failed to load packit config file:

Cannot parse package config. ValidationError({'jobs': {0: {'packages': defaultdict(<class 'dict'>, {'blivet-gui': {'value': {'fix-spec-file': ['Unknown field.']}}})}, 1: {'packages': defaultdict(<class 'dict'>, {'blivet-gui': {'value': {'fix-spec-file': ['Unknown field.']}}})}}})

For more info, please check out the documentation or contact the Packit team.

@vojtechtrefny vojtechtrefny force-pushed the main_packit-release-suffix branch 3 times, most recently from eedc645 to 1acf6a5 Compare November 25, 2023 12:47
Copy link

Failed to load packit config file:

Cannot parse package config. ValidationError({'jobs': {0: {'packages': defaultdict(<class 'dict'>, {'blivet-gui': {'value': {'actions': ['Field may not be null.']}}})}}})

For more info, please check out the documentation or contact the Packit team.

We want a high release number (99) for the daily builds done by
Packit to make sure the Copr daily builds are always newer than
the version in Fedora. We can do this in Packit config instead of
bumping the release in the spec everytime.
@vojtechtrefny vojtechtrefny merged commit 5b9af3e into storaged-project:main Nov 25, 2023
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant