Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add wasm support for blas/base/ddot-wasm #2986

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add wasm support for blas/base/ddot-wasm #2986

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aman-095
Copy link
Member

@aman-095 aman-095 commented Oct 4, 2024

Progresses #2039.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request adds wasm support for blas/base/ddot.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the BLAS Issue or pull request related to Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS). label Oct 4, 2024
@aman-095 aman-095 added Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. WebAssembly Issue involves or relates to WebAssembly. labels Oct 4, 2024
@aman-095 aman-095 marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2024 06:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
BLAS Issue or pull request related to Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS). Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. WebAssembly Issue involves or relates to WebAssembly.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@aman-095 @stdlib-bot