Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
INFRA-839 Add playbooks, config & docs for enabling Pulp tls with vault #1427
base: stackhpc/2024.1
Are you sure you want to change the base?
INFRA-839 Add playbooks, config & docs for enabling Pulp tls with vault #1427
Changes from 1 commit
b69f2bd
c239387
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only thing to point out here is that we have a bootstrapping issue where we have to bring the controllers up and deploy vault before generating the certs. You could use the vault on the seed to generate the certificate for pulp instead, but is it better to always use the overcloud vault? What do people think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we want to use vault from the seed (which might make more sense, since this is being deployed on the seed) then we'll need a second intermediate CA?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would make sense to have TLS for Pulp before we need to use Pulp at all, so even before Bifrost. So +1 to not relying on the overcloud vault
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we do that as a part 2? and perhaps call this 'Deploying pulp with TLS on an existing cloud?'