-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add ceph-mon
service to osds
hosts firewall
#1419
base: stackhpc/2024.1
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
nit: Should probably have a release note |
2df64ab
to
29961cb
Compare
/cherry-pick stackhpc/2023.1 |
29961cb
to
c11d1f6
Compare
Shouldn't you merge first? |
From the bot docs:
|
The cherry pick will only happen after this has merged. https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/tree/main/packages/cherry-pick-bot#on-unmerged-pull-request This way I can line up the cherry-pick now and not after it has merged. |
This is odd behaviour, can you confirm that you see OSDs listening on ports 3300 or 6789? |
It is also worth noting that the highest port number used by Ceph was increased in [1] but the firewalld service definition was not updated right away [2]. |
--- | ||
features: | ||
- | | ||
Add `ceph-mon` as a `firewalld` service rule to hosts of `osds`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use double backticks.
I think maybe solution is a bit clouded and maybe the firewall change here is a redherring. I don't have any appetite to revert the change in the environment where the problem was observed. It was certainly missing I think this could be tested within virtualised environment to be sure if this is required at all. Will mark as draft for now. |
Checked impacted hosts those ports are not in use. |
c11d1f6
to
431b9d6
Compare
Hosts that carry just
OSDs
appear to requireceph-mon
service firewalls to ensure communication forCeph MDS
connectivity.