Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase size of connection tracking table #1328

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stackhpc/2023.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

priteau
Copy link
Member

@priteau priteau commented Oct 11, 2024

We have seen occurences of Cinder or Glance activity filling up the conntrack table. This has been seen on controllers and storage nodes (Ceph). We have also seen large amounts of traffic to an Octavia amphora causing the conntrack table of a compute host to fill up.

Quadruple the maximum size of the table on these hosts (the default size is 262,144 for hosts with more than 4 GiB of memory [1]).

Monitoring hosts are left unchanged since they are believed to be unaffected.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.txt

We have seen occurences of Cinder or Glance activity filling up the
conntrack table. This has been seen on controllers and storage nodes
(Ceph). We have also seen large amounts of traffic to an Octavia amphora
causing the conntrack table of a compute host to fill up.

Quadruple the maximum size of the table on these hosts (the default size
is 262,144 for hosts with more than 4 GiB of memory [1]).

Monitoring hosts are left unchanged since they are believed to be
unaffected.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.txt
@priteau priteau self-assigned this Oct 11, 2024
@priteau priteau requested a review from a team as a code owner October 11, 2024 13:22
@priteau priteau marked this pull request as draft October 11, 2024 15:00
@priteau
Copy link
Member Author

priteau commented Oct 11, 2024

The conntrack table can only be increased if the nf_conntrack module is loaded, which is the case only when the firewall is activated.

@MoteHue
Copy link
Contributor

MoteHue commented Oct 11, 2024

The conntrack table can only be increased if the nf_conntrack module is loaded, which is the case only when the firewall is activated.

In the situation where we've enabled the firewall then chosen to disable it, is it safe to assume nf_conntrack will have also been disabled/unloaded?

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh added bug Something isn't working antelope Targets the Antelope OpenStack release labels Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
antelope Targets the Antelope OpenStack release bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants