Skip to content

Question about getFrameJacobianTimeVariation in LOCAL frame #2463

Answered by jcarpent
Linjackffy asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

You're correct, one term is missing.
Yet, the result Jdot * v is correct ;)

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@Linjackffy
Comment options

Answer selected by jcarpent
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants