Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add "Architecture and Load Balancers" #2574

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
56 changes: 0 additions & 56 deletions docs/architecture.md

This file was deleted.

54 changes: 54 additions & 0 deletions docs/architecture/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
# Architectural Considerations

Building a syslog ingestion architecture is complex and requires careful planning. The syslog protocol prioritizes speed and efficiency, often at the expense of resiliency and reliability. Due to these trade-offs, traditional scaling methods may not be directly applicable to syslog.

This document outlines recommended architectural solutions, along with alternative or unsupported methods that some users have found viable.

## Edge vs. Centralized Collection

While TCP and TLS are supported, UDP remains the dominant protocol for syslog transport in many data centers. Since syslog is a "send and forget" protocol, it performs poorly when routed through complex network infrastructures, including front-end load balancers and WAN.

### Recommendation: Use Edge Collection

The most reliable way to gather syslog traffic is through edge collection rather than centralized collection. If your syslog server is centrally located, UDP and stateless TCP traffic cannot adapt, leading to data loss.

## Avoid Load Balancing for Syslog

For optimal performance, scale vertically by fine-tuning a single, robust server. Key tools and methods for enhancing performance on your SC4S server are documented in:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Scale vertically by fine-tuning a single, robust server. Tools and methods for enhancing performance on your SC4S server are documented in:


1. [Fine-tune for TCP](tcp-optimization.md)
2. [Fine-tune for UDP](udp-optimization.md)

We advise against co-locating syslog-ng servers for horizontal scaling with load balancers. The challenges of load balancing for horizontal scaling are outlined in the [Load Balancer's Overview](lb/index.md) section.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Avoid co-locating syslog-ng servers for horizontal scaling with load balancers. Load balancing challenges for horizontal scaling are described in the Load Balancer's Overview section.


## High Availability (HA) Considerations

Syslog, being prone to data loss, can only achieve "mostly available" data collection.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Syslog is prone to data loss and can only achieve "mostly available" data collection.


### HA Without Load Balancers

Load balancing does not suit syslog’s stateless, unacknowledged traffic. More data is preserved with simpler designs, such as vMotioned VMs.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Load balancing does not work well with syslog’s stateless, unacknowledged traffic. To preserve more data by using simpler designs, such as vMotioned VMs.


The optimal deployment model for high availability uses a [Microk8s](https://microk8s.io/) setup with MetalLB in BGP mode. This method implements load balancing through destination network translation, providing better HA results.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The best deployment model for high availability traffic is a Microk8s setup with MetalLB in BGP mode. This implements load balancing through destination network translation, providing better HA results.


## UDP vs. TCP

Syslog optimally uses UDP for log forwarding due to its low overhead and simplicity. UDP's streaming nature eliminates the need for network session establishment, which reduces network strain and avoids complex verification processes.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Syslog uses UDP for log forwarding due to its low overhead and simplicity. UDP's streaming nature eliminates the need for network session establishment, which reduces network strain and avoids complex verification processes.


### Drawbacks of TCP

While TCP uses acknowledgement signals (ACKS) to mitigate data loss, issues still arise, such as:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TCP uses acknowledgement signals (ACKS) to mitigate data loss. Issues may still arise, including:


- Loss of events during TCP session establishment
- Slow acknowledgment signals leading to buffer overflows
- Lost acknowledgments causing closed connections
- Data loss during server restarts

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Events may be lost during TCP session establishment.
  • Slow acknowledgment signals may lead to buffer overflows.
  • Lost acknowledgments may cause closed connections.
  • Data may be lost when the server restarts.

### When to Use UDP vs. TCP

Use UDP by default for syslog forwarding, switching to TCP for larger syslog events that exceed UDP packet limits (common with Web Proxy, DLP, and IDS sources).

The following resources will help you choose the best protocol for your setup:

1. [Run performance tests for TCP](performance-tests.md#check-your-tcp-performance)
2. [Run performance tests for UDP](performance-tests.md#check-your-udp-performance)
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions docs/architecture/lb/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
# Load Balancers Are Not a Best Practice for SC4S

Be aware of the following issues that may arise from load balancing syslog traffic:
- Load balancing for scale can lead to increased data loss due to normal device operations and buffer overflows.
- Front-side load balancing often results in uneven data distribution on the upstream side.
- The default behavior of Layer 4 (L4) load balancers is to overwrite the client's source IP with their own. Preserving the real source IP requires additional configuration.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Load balancing for scale can lead to increased data loss during to normal device operations and buffer overflows.
  • Front-side load balancing often results in uneven upstream data distribution.
  • The default behavior of many load balancers is to overwrite the client's source IP with their own. Preserving the real source IP requires additional configuration.

### Recommendations for Using Load Balancers:
- Preserve the actual source IP of the sending device.
- Avoid using load balancers without High Availability (HA) mode.
- TCP/TLS load balancers often do not account for the load on individual connections and may favor one instance over others. Ensure all members in a resource pool are vertically scaled to handle the full workload.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Best practices when using load balancers:

  • Preserve the actual source IP of the sending device.
  • Avoid using load balancers without High Availability (HA) mode.
  • TCP/TLS load balancers may not account for the load on individual connections and might favor one instance over others. Ensure all members in a resource pool are vertically scaled to handle the full workload.

For **TCP/TLS**, you can use either a DNAT configuration or SNAT with the "PROXY" protocol enabled by setting `SC4S_SOURCE_PROXYCONNECT=yes`.
For **UDP**, traffic can only pass through a load balancer using DNAT.

This section of the documentation discusses various load balancing solutions and potential configurations, along with known issues.
Please note that load balancing syslog traffic in front of SC4S is not supported by Splunk, and additional support from the load balancer vendor may be required.
190 changes: 190 additions & 0 deletions docs/architecture/lb/nginx-os.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
# Nginx Open Source

This section of the documentation describes the challenges of load balancing syslog traffic using Nginx Open Source.

There are several key disadvantages to using Nginx Open Source for this purpose:
- Nginx Open Source does not provide active health checking, which is essential for UDP DSR (Direct Server Return) load balancing.
- Even with round-robin load balancing, traffic distribution can often be uneven, leading to overloaded instances in the pool. This results in growing queues, causing delays, data drops, and potential memory or disk issues.
- Without High Availability, an Nginx Open Source load balancer becomes a new single point of failure.

**Please note that Splunk only supports SC4S**. If issues arise due to the load balancer, please reach out to the Nginx support team.

## Install Nginx

1. Refer to the Nginx documentation for instructions on installing Nginx **with the stream module**, which is required for TCP/UDP load balancing. For example, on Ubuntu:
```bash
sudo apt update
sudo apt -y install nginx libnginx-mod-stream
```

2. (Optionally) Refer to the Nginx documentation for instructions on fine-tuning Nginx performance. For example, you can update the `events` section in your Nginx configuration file:

`/etc/nginx/nginx.conf`
```conf
events {
worker_connections 20480;
multi_accept on;
use epoll;
}
```
Please note that actual load balancer fine-tuning is beyond the scope of the SC4S team's responsibility.

## Preserving Source IP
The default behavior of Nginx is to overwrite the source IP with the LB's IP. While some users accept this behavior, it is recommended to preserve the original source IP of the message.

Nginx offers three methods to preserve the source IP:

| Method | Protocol |
|-----------------------------|------------|
| PROXY protocol | TCP* |
| Transparent IP | TCP/TLS |
| Direct Server Return (DSR) | UDP |

* TLS PROXY protocol support in SC4S is scheduled for implementation.

Examples for setting up Nginx with the PROXY protocol and DSR are provided below. The Transparent IP method requires complex network configuration. For more details, refer to [this Nginx blog post](https://www.f5.com/company/blog/nginx/ip-transparency-direct-server-return-nginx-plus-transparent-proxy).


## Option 1: Configure Nginx Open Source with the PROXY Protocol

### Advantages:
- Easy to set up

### Disadvantages:
- Available only for TCP, not for UDP or TLS
- Overwriting the source IP in SC4S is not ideal; the `SOURCEIP` is a hard macro and only `HOST` can be overwritten
- Overwriting the source IP is available only in SC4S versions greater than 3.4.0

### Configuration

1. On your load balancer (LB) node, add a configuration similar to the following:
`/etc/nginx/modules-enabled/sc4s.conf`
```conf
stream {
# Define upstream for each of SC4S hosts and ports
# Default SC4S TCP ports are 514, 601
# Include your custom ports if applicable
upstream stream_syslog_514 {
server <SC4S_IP_1>:514;
server <SC4S_IP_2>:514;
}
upstream stream_syslog_601 {
server <SC4S_IP_1>:601;
server <SC4S_IP_2>:601;
}

# Define a common configuration block for all servers
map $server_port $upstream_name {
514 stream_syslog_514;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably we also need tell that we can use port segregation, it will increase performance:

SC4S_LISTEN_DEFAULT_TCP_PORT=514,515,516,517

601 stream_syslog_601;
}

# Define a virtual server for each upstream connection
# Ensure 'proxy_protocol' is set to 'on'
server {
listen 514;
listen 601;
mstopa-splunk marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
proxy_pass $upstream_name;

proxy_timeout 3s;
proxy_connect_timeout 3s;

proxy_protocol on;
}
}
```

3. Refer to the Nginx documentation to find the command to reload the service, for example:
```bash
sudo nginx -s reload
```

4. Add the following parameter to the SC4S configuration and restart your instances:
`/opt/sc4s/env_file`
```conf
SC4S_SOURCE_PROXYCONNECT=yes
```

### Test Your Setup
Send TCP messages to the load balancer and verify that they are correctly received in Splunk with the host set to your source IP, not the LB's IP:

```bash
# Test message without IETF frame for port 514/TCP:
echo "hello world" | netcat <LB_IP> 514
# Test message with IETF frame for port 601/TCP:
echo "11 hello world" | netcat <LB_IP> 601
```

3. Run performance tests based on the [Check TCP Performance](tcp_performance_tests.md) section.

| Receiver | Performance |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Single SC4S Server | 4,341,000 (71,738.98 msg/sec) |
| Load Balancer + 2 Servers | 5,996,000 (99,089.03 msg/sec) |

Please note that load balancer fine-tuning is beyond the scope of the SC4S team's responsibility. For assistance in increasing the TCP throughput of your load balancer instance, contact the Nginx support team.

## Option 2: Configure Nginx with DSR (Direct Server Return)

### Advantages:
- Works for UDP
- Saves one hop and additional wrapping

### Disadvantages:
- DSR setup requires active health checks because the load balancer cannot expect responses from the upstream. Active health checks are not available in Nginx Open Source, so switch to Nginx Plus or implement your own active health checking.
- Requires superuser privileges.
- For cloud users, this might require disabling `Source/Destination Checking` (tested with AWS).

1. In the main Nginx configuration, update the `user` to root:
`/etc/nginx/nginx.conf`
```conf
user root;
```

2. Add a configuration similar to the following in:
`/etc/nginx/modules-enabled/sc4s.conf`
```conf
stream {
# Define upstream for each of SC4S hosts and ports
# Default SC4S UDP port is 514
# Include your custom ports if applicable
upstream stream_syslog_514 {
server <SC4S_IP_1>:514;
server <SC4S_IP_2>:514;
}

# Define connections to each of your upstreams.
# Ensure to include `proxy_bind` and `proxy_responses 0`.
server {
listen 514 udp;
proxy_pass stream_syslog_514;

proxy_bind $remote_addr:$remote_port transparent;
proxy_responses 0;
}
}
```

3. Refer to the Nginx documentation to find the command to reload the service, for example:
```bash
sudo nginx -s reload
```

4. Ensure that you disable `Source/Destination Checking` on your load balancer's host if you are working on AWS.

### Test Your Setup
1. Send UDP messages to the load balancer and verify that they are correctly received in Splunk with the correct host IP:
```bash
echo "hello world" > /dev/udp/<LB_IP>/514
```

2. Run performance tests

| Receiver / Drops Rate for EPS (msgs/sec) | 4,500 | 9,000 | 27,000 | 50,000 | 150,000 | 300,000 |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|---------|
| Single SC4S Server | 0.33% | 1.24% | 52.31% | 74.71% | -- | -- |
| Load Balancer + 2 Servers | 1% | 1.19% | 6.11% | 47.64% | -- | -- |
| Single Finetuned SC4S Server | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 47.37% | -- |
| Load Balancer + 2 Finetuned Servers | 0.98% | 1.14% | 1.05% | 1.16% | 3.56% | 55.54% |

Please note that load balancer fine-tuning is beyond the scope of the SC4S team's responsibility. For assistance in minimizing UDP drops on the load balancer side, contact the Nginx support team.
Loading
Loading