Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename the pushdown config into a positive boolean value #537

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

AdamGS
Copy link
Contributor

@AdamGS AdamGS commented Aug 2, 2024

No description provided.

@AdamGS AdamGS requested review from a10y and gatesn August 2, 2024 09:48
@AdamGS AdamGS enabled auto-merge (squash) August 2, 2024 09:49
Copy link
Contributor

@gatesn gatesn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3

@AdamGS AdamGS disabled auto-merge August 2, 2024 09:54
@AdamGS AdamGS force-pushed the adamg/pushdown-positive-bools branch from cf44589 to 4537a52 Compare August 2, 2024 09:55
@AdamGS AdamGS enabled auto-merge (squash) August 2, 2024 09:55
@AdamGS AdamGS merged commit 89e918b into develop Aug 2, 2024
3 checks passed
@AdamGS AdamGS deleted the adamg/pushdown-positive-bools branch August 2, 2024 09:59
@@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ const SUPPORTED_BINARY_OPS: &[Operator] = &[
/// Optional configurations to pass when loading a [VortexMemTable].
#[derive(Default, Debug, Clone)]
pub struct VortexMemTableOptions {
pub disable_pushdown: bool,
pub enable_pushdown: bool,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we do this we need to impl default by hand

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice catch, I'll add that to the file provider PR

@AdamGS AdamGS mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2024
AdamGS added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
Fix a couple of issues I missed in #537 - had to flip values for some
benchmark and add a hand-rolled `Default` implementation as noted by
@a10y
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants