Switch okify to GitHub Actions

[melanieclarke]

Update the okify script to look for regression test artifacts from GitHub Actions instead of Jenkins

Checklist for PR authors (skip items if you don't have permissions or they are not applicable)

• added entry in CHANGES.rst within the relevant release section
• updated or added relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• added relevant milestone
• added relevant label(s)
• ran regression tests, post a link to the Jenkins job below.
  How to run regression tests on a PR
• All comments are resolved
• Make sure the JIRA ticket is resolved properly

[melanieclarke]

@tapastro - based on similar changes for romancal, I think this is what's needed to update our okify script when we're ready to move over to GitHub Actions.

I tested by starting an okify run and it found the artifacts appropriately, but didn't try actually okifying anything.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.80%. Comparing base (b01dadd) to head (eb5f0ec).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
jwst/scripts/okify_regtests.py	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8762   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.79%   61.80%           
=======================================
  Files         377      377           
  Lines       38827    38824    -3     
=======================================
  Hits        23994    23994           
+ Misses      14833    14830    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zacharyburnett]

this raises the question; should we move the okify script to a common upstream between jwst and romancal, so that underlying infrastructure changes are easier to make?

[melanieclarke]

There are currently some other differences between the two scripts, but we could probably come to an agreement on which version is preferable. I'm all in favor of de-duplicating the code.

[zacharyburnett]

this looks good to me, if the devs are willing to switch to GitHub Actions regression tests as canonical

[zacharyburnett]

we'll look into consolidating okify_regtests later