Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generated Protocol Bindings #1931

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

Generated Protocol Bindings #1931

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

RXminuS
Copy link
Contributor

@RXminuS RXminuS commented Jul 22, 2024

Adds generated protocol bindings for use in #1921

Test plan

  • Doesn't use generated protocol bindings. Verified that build still works

@RXminuS RXminuS self-assigned this Jul 22, 2024
@RXminuS RXminuS marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2024 12:10
@RXminuS RXminuS requested a review from pkukielka July 22, 2024 12:12
// This is just a temporary solution to make it easier to use certain generated protocol
// messages.
// Ultimately this should entirely be replaced by use of the generated protocol.
if (!isForceProtocolCopy) {
Copy link
Contributor

@pkukielka pkukielka Jul 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the purpose of this flag if it needs to always be set for task to have any effect?
Shouldn't force be necessary only if the protocol files already exists? (is it even an option that no such files would be present)?
If that flag is always needed then equally good we can just not have it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll address this when we set up CI & automatic generation on builds etc. For now it's all manual while we iron out the wrinkles

Copy link
Contributor

@pkukielka pkukielka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM except one other comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@mkondratek mkondratek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok but pls note the Peter's comment

@RXminuS RXminuS merged commit 39b176f into main Jul 25, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@RXminuS RXminuS deleted the rnauta/CODY-2830 branch July 25, 2024 12:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants