standardize on a single prompt format for codebase context #3412
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jtibshirani
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2024
abeatrix
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2024
sqs
force-pushed
the
sqs/question-prompt
branch
from
3ad4736
to
1eb95d4
Compare
Previously, there were several very similar (but slightly different) templates for introducing code snippets as context. - "Use the following text from FILE ..." - Sometimes backticks around file paths and repo names, sometimes not. - Markdown files are cited differently from non-Markdown files. There were also several unused functions here. This improves the response quality regarding #3331.
sqs
force-pushed
the
sqs/question-prompt
branch
from
1eb95d4
to
044adfd
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, there were several very similar (but slightly different) templates for introducing code snippets as context.
There were also several unused functions here.
This improves the response quality regarding #3331 (for the
how does authentication work in sourcegraph/cody?question at least).Test plan
CI