Clean up comments/formatting

tests/examples/Fervo_Project_Cape-3.txt

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
 # Case Study: Fervo Project Cape 3: Extrapolation from Fervo results pre-published 2024-09-10 at
 # https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/7665/ to 400MWe capacity.
-# Norbeck J., -- Gradl C., and Latimer T. 2024.
+# Norbeck J., Gradl C., and Latimer T. 2024.
 #    "Deployment of Enhanced Geothermal System technology leads to rapid cost reductions and performance improvements."
 #    https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VH8C
+
 Reservoir Model, 1
 Reservoir Volume Option, 1
 Reservoir Density, 2800
@@ -11,13 +12,16 @@ Reservoir Heat Capacity, 790
 Reservoir Thermal Conductivity, 3.05
 Reservoir Porosity, 0.0118
 Reservoir Impedance, 0.001
+
 Number of Fractures, 149
 Fracture Shape, 4
 Fracture Height, 2000
 Fracture Width, 10000
 Fracture Separation, 30
+
 Number of Segments, 1
 Gradient 1, 74, -- temperature at 8500 ft: 200 degC (https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/GeoConf/papers/SGW/2024/Fercho.pdf); 228.89 degC @ 9824 ft (https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VH8C)
+
 Number of Injection Wells, 39
 Number of Production Wells, 39
 Production Flow Rate per Well, 120, -- peak flow reported in paper
@@ -38,8 +42,9 @@ End-Use Option, 1
 Plant Lifetime, 20
 Power Plant Type, 2
 Circulation Pump Efficiency, 0.80
+
 Exploration Capital Cost, 30
-Well Drilling and Completion Capital Cost, 3.84,
+Well Drilling and Completion Capital Cost, 3.84, -- Assume cost continues to decrease from $4.8M/well (https://houston.innovationmap.com/fervo-energy-drilling-utah-project-2667300142.html)
 Reservoir Stimulation Capital Cost, 234, -- 78 wells @ $3M/well
 Economic Model, 3
 Starting Electricity Sale Price, 0.15
@@ -57,6 +62,7 @@ Inflation Rate During Construction, 0.05
 Property Tax Rate, 0
 Time steps per year, 10
 Maximum Temperature, 500
+
 Surface Plant Capital Cost Adjustment Factor, 0.71, -- $1900/kW (peak production)
 Well Geometry Configuration, 4
 Has Nonvertical Section, True