-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NO-SNOW: Two minor changes that address PR comments and fix code format #679
Conversation
sfc-gh-tzhang
commented
Feb 20, 2024
- Address the comment in 0c85b60 and add a test
- Fix some format issues added by a69e6f4
…-ingest-java into tzhang-si-overflow
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ public boolean equals(Object o) { | |||
if (this == o) return true; | |||
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false; | |||
FileColumnProperties that = (FileColumnProperties) o; | |||
return Objects.equals(columnOrdinal,that.columnOrdinal) | |||
return Objects.equals(columnOrdinal, that.columnOrdinal) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My recent format.sh script suggested me these changes as well.
ahh do you know why it passed in previous PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not really, i don't know why it passed the format gate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm! I will let you push first to not have my PR bloated up.
FYI: testFlushHelper
is failing