Draft: break: Generate code #219
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes various changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on updates to ESLint configurations, modifications in documentation, and structural changes in the codebase. Key alterations involve disabling specific TypeScript linting rules, renaming configuration keys, and enhancing tutorial clarity. Additionally, significant refactoring has occurred in resolver generation, mutation handling, and utility function organization, alongside the removal of obsolete files and exports. The changes aim to streamline code readability, maintainability, and consistency in the project's structure. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
src/resolvers/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Note: This file is automatically generated.The comment at the top of the file indicates that it's created by 'create-ts-index'. Be cautious when making manual changes to this file, as they might be overwritten by the automatic generation process.
src/bin/gqm/gqm.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-91: Summary of changes and suggestions for next steps.The changes in this file represent significant improvements to the CLI tool, including:
- Renaming of
gqlModuletogqmModulefor consistency.- Shifting to TypeScript-based schema generation.
- Addition of automatic resolver generation.
To ensure the quality and reliability of these changes, consider the following next steps:
- Conduct thorough testing of all modified and new functionalities.
- Update the project's documentation to reflect these changes, especially the new resolver generation feature and the switch to TypeScript-based schema.
- Review the entire codebase for any references to old function names or parameters that might have been missed during this refactoring.
- Consider adding more detailed inline comments explaining the rationale behind significant changes, such as the switch to TypeScript-based schema.
Given the scope of these changes, it might be beneficial to create a migration guide for users of the library, detailing how to update their projects to accommodate these new features and changes.
package.json (1)
18-18: Approve the script update with a suggestion for error handling.The addition of ESLint with auto-fix to the
generate:gqm-stuffscript is a good improvement. It ensures that generated tests adhere to the project's coding standards automatically.Consider adding error handling to prevent the script from failing silently if the ESLint command encounters issues. You can achieve this by using the
set -ebash option and wrapping the commands in a try-catch block. Here's a suggested improvement:- "generate:gqm-stuff": "npx gqm generate && eslint tests/generated --fix", + "generate:gqm-stuff": "npx gqm generate && eslint tests/generated --fix || echo 'Warning: ESLint encountered issues that could not be automatically fixed.'",This change will still run both commands but will print a warning message if ESLint encounters any issues it can't automatically fix, ensuring visibility of potential problems.
tests/api/inheritance.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
7-124: Consider expanding test coverage as per TODO commentThe overall structure and coverage of the tests look good. The tests cover various scenarios for queries and mutations, which is essential for ensuring the reliability of the inheritance-related functionality.
There's a TODO comment suggesting additional test cases for various relation types. Consider creating a task or issue to implement these additional tests in the future to further improve the test coverage.
docs/docs/7-graphql-client.md (2)
33-52: LGTM: Improved JSX formatting.The changes enhance code readability and follow React best practices for JSX formatting. The consistent indentation and line breaks make the component structure clearer.
Consider adding a
keyprop to the outermost<div>in the map function for better React reconciliation:{posts.map((post) => ( - <div key={post.id}> + <div key={post.id}> <article> ... </article> </div> ))}
130-147: LGTM: Improved imports and mutation execution.The changes enhance code consistency, type safety, and readability. The server action implementation follows Next.js best practices.
Consider adding error handling to the
createPostfunction:async function createPost(formData: FormData) { 'use server'; - await executeGraphql<CreatePostMutationMutation, CreatePostMutationMutationVariables>({ - query: CREATE_POST, - variables: { - data: { - title: formData.get('title') as string, - content: formData.get('content') as string, - }, - }, - }); - revalidatePath('/'); + try { + await executeGraphql<CreatePostMutationMutation, CreatePostMutationMutationVariables>({ + query: CREATE_POST, + variables: { + data: { + title: formData.get('title') as string, + content: formData.get('content') as string, + }, + }, + }); + revalidatePath('/'); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to create post:', error); + // Handle the error appropriately + } }src/bin/gqm/settings.ts (1)
Line range hint
98-104: Fix typographical error ininitSettingsfunctionThere's a critical typographical error in the
initSettingsfunction. The propertyquestonis incorrectly used instead ofquestion. This error could lead to runtime issues and cause some settings to be skipped during initialization.Please apply the following fix:
const initSettings = async () => { const settings: Settings = {} as Settings; for (const [name, config] of Object.entries(DEFAULTS)) { - if ('queston' in config) { + if ('question' in config) { settings[name] = await initSetting(name); } } saveSettings(settings); };docs/docs/1-tutorial.md (5)
221-236: Robust user retrieval and creation logic implementedThe added code effectively handles user retrieval and creation:
- Correctly checks for an existing session and queries the database.
- Creates a new user record if one doesn't exist.
- Properly constructs the user object with database information.
However, consider the following suggestion:
Instead of hardcoding the 'ADMIN' role for every user, consider implementing a more flexible role assignment system. This could involve storing the user's role in the database and retrieving it along with other user information.
353-373: Comprehensive GET_POSTS query implementedThe new GET_POSTS GraphQL query is well-structured and comprehensive:
- Includes all necessary fields for posts (id, title, content).
- Fetches associated user data (username) for both posts and comments.
- Properly nests the comments query within the posts query.
This query will provide all the necessary data for displaying posts and their comments in the UI.
Consider adding pagination to the query to optimize performance, especially if you expect to have a large number of posts or comments. This could involve adding limit and offset parameters to the query.
423-447: Well-structured Posts component for displaying blog contentThe new Posts component effectively displays blog posts and comments:
- Utilizes the GET_POSTS query to fetch necessary data.
- Renders post details (title, content, author) and associated comments.
- Conditionally renders the CreateComment component for authenticated users.
- Maintains clean and consistent code structure.
This component provides a comprehensive view of the blog's content.
For improved performance with large datasets, consider implementing pagination or infinite scrolling. This would involve modifying the GET_POSTS query to accept limit and offset parameters, and updating the component to handle loading more posts as the user scrolls.
452-480: Effective CreatePost component for blog post creationThe CreatePost component is well-implemented:
- Utilizes a server action (createPost) for form submission.
- Correctly executes the CREATE_POST mutation with form data.
- Includes necessary fields for post creation (title and content).
- Uses revalidatePath for immediate UI update after post creation.
- Maintains clean and consistent code structure.
This component provides a straightforward way for users to create new blog posts.
Consider adding user feedback for successful post creation or potential errors. This could involve using React's useState and useEffect hooks to manage a success/error message state, or implementing a toast notification system.
Line range hint
1-508: Comprehensive and well-structured tutorial for building a blog with graphql-magic and Next.jsThis tutorial provides an excellent guide for developers looking to create a blog using graphql-magic and Next.js. It covers all essential aspects of the development process, from initial setup to implementing core features like authentication, post creation, and commenting.
Key strengths:
- Clear step-by-step instructions
- Well-formatted and easy-to-follow code snippets
- Comprehensive coverage of both frontend and backend aspects
To further enhance the tutorial:
- Consider adding a section on error handling and form validation.
- Include information on testing strategies for the implemented features.
- Provide guidance on deploying the application to a production environment.
These additions would make the tutorial even more valuable for developers looking to build production-ready applications.
src/schema/generate.ts (1)
312-314: LGTM: New functionprintSchemaAsVariablesadded.The new
printSchemaAsVariablesfunction is a valuable addition that allows exporting the schema in a format suitable for client-side usage withgraphql-request. This aligns well with the project's direction.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to describe the function's purpose and parameters:
/** * Generates a string that exports the GraphQL schema as a constant, * ready for use with graphql-request. * @param models - The Models object used to generate the schema * @returns A string containing the exported schema */ export const printSchemaAsVariables = (models: Models) => { // ... existing implementation ... };src/utils/getters.ts (2)
9-13: Ensure consistent logging before throwing errors.In the
summonfunction,console.trace()is used before throwing an error. In other functions likegetandit, different logging methods are utilized. For consistency and clarity, consider using the same logging method across all utility functions.Apply this diff to use
console.error()consistently:- console.trace(); + console.error('Base array is not defined.');
33-41: Use consistent error logging ingetfunction.In the
getfunction,console.warn(error)is used before throwing an error, whereasconsole.trace()orconsole.error()is used in other functions. For consistency, consider standardizing the logging approach.Apply this diff to update the logging method:
- console.warn(error); + console.error(error.message);src/permissions/check.ts (4)
Line range hint
36-43: Potential index out-of-bounds access inapplyPermissionsfunctionIn the
applyPermissionsfunction, the code usesget(chain, chain.length - 1)without verifying thatchainis not empty:!('where' in get(chain, chain.length - 1)) && !('me' in get(chain, chain.length - 1))If
chainis an empty array,chain.length - 1evaluates to-1, which may causegetto returnundefinedor result in unexpected behavior. Please add a check to ensure thatchainis not empty before accessing its elements.Consider modifying the code as follows to prevent potential errors:
+ if (chain.length > 0 && !('where' in get(chain, chain.length - 1)) && !('me' in get(chain, chain.length - 1))) { // existing logic + }
Line range hint
91-94: Redundant logging before throwing errorsIn the
getEntityToMutatefunction,console.erroris called before throwing aNotFoundErrororPermissionError:console.error(`Not found: ${Object.entries(where).map(([key, value]) => `${key}: ${value}`).join(', ')}`); throw new NotFoundError(`Entity to ${action.toLowerCase()}`); console.error(`Permission error: ${Object.entries(where).map(([key, value]) => `${key}: ${value}`).join(', ')}`); throw new PermissionError(getRole(ctx), action, `this ${model.name}`, 'no available permissions applied');This may lead to duplicate error messages if the exceptions are also logged elsewhere. Consider removing the
console.errorstatements or ensure that error handling is consistent throughout the application.
Line range hint
141-143: Possible unhandled case whenlinksarray is empty inpermissionLinkQueryIn the
permissionLinkQueryfunction, the code destructures the first element of thelinksarray without checking if the array is non-empty:const { type, me, where } = links[0];If
linksis an empty array, this will result in an error. Please add a check to ensure thatlinksis not empty before attempting to access its elements.Modify the function to handle empty
linksarrays appropriately:+ if (links.length === 0) { + // Handle the case when links is empty + subQuery.where(false); + return; + } const { type, me, where } = links[0];
Line range hint
173-183: Optimize recursive joins inapplyWherefunction for better performanceThe
applyWherefunction performs recursive joins and where clauses for nested relations, which could lead to complex and inefficient SQL queries, especially with deeply nested conditions. Consider optimizing the query construction to improve performance.One possible approach is to limit the depth of recursion or to restructure the query to utilize more efficient SQL constructs, such as using
WITHclauses (Common Table Expressions) or optimizing the joins.src/models/models.ts (1)
Line range hint
335-340: Suggestion: Add documentation comments for new propertiesConsider adding JSDoc comments for the new properties
asField,pluralField,slug,labelPlural, andlabelin theEntityModelclass to improve code readability and maintainability.src/resolvers/generate.ts (2)
478-478: Check condition for mutations arrayThe condition
if (mutations)will always be truthy sincemutationsis an array. To accurately check if there are mutations to process, consider usingif (mutations.length > 0).Apply this diff to adjust the condition:
675-676: Address the TODO for revisions on deletable modelsThe TODO comment at lines 675-676 indicates that revisions for models that are deletable but not updatable need to be handled. Consider implementing this functionality or creating an issue to track this task.
Would you like assistance in implementing revisions for deletable but non-updatable models, or should we create a GitHub issue to track this task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (10)
tests/api/__snapshots__/inheritance.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/generated/api/index.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**tests/generated/client/index.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**tests/generated/client/mutations.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**tests/generated/db/index.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**tests/generated/db/knex.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**tests/generated/resolvers/index.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**tests/generated/schema/index.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**tests/unit/__snapshots__/queries.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snaptests/unit/__snapshots__/resolve.spec.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (39)
- .eslintrc (1 hunks)
- .gqmrc.json (1 hunks)
- docs/docs/1-tutorial.md (8 hunks)
- docs/docs/7-graphql-client.md (5 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/api/execute.ts (0 hunks)
- src/api/index.ts (0 hunks)
- src/bin/gqm/gqm.ts (2 hunks)
- src/bin/gqm/settings.ts (1 hunks)
- src/bin/gqm/templates.ts (1 hunks)
- src/client/gql.ts (0 hunks)
- src/client/index.ts (0 hunks)
- src/client/models.ts (0 hunks)
- src/client/mutations.ts (1 hunks)
- src/client/queries.ts (0 hunks)
- src/context.ts (2 hunks)
- src/db/generate.ts (4 hunks)
- src/index.ts (0 hunks)
- src/migrations/generate.ts (5 hunks)
- src/models/models.ts (7 hunks)
- src/models/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- src/permissions/check.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/arguments.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/generate.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/mutations.ts (0 hunks)
- src/resolvers/node.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/resolver.ts (2 hunks)
- src/resolvers/resolvers.ts (0 hunks)
- src/resolvers/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/schema/generate.ts (3 hunks)
- src/utils/getters.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/api/delete.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/api/inheritance.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/api/query.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/queries.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- tests/unit/resolve.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- tests/utils/server.ts (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (11)
- src/api/execute.ts
- src/api/index.ts
- src/client/gql.ts
- src/client/index.ts
- src/client/models.ts
- src/client/queries.ts
- src/index.ts
- src/resolvers/mutations.ts
- src/resolvers/resolvers.ts
- tests/unit/queries.spec.ts
- tests/unit/resolve.spec.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- src/resolvers/arguments.ts
- src/resolvers/utils.ts
- tests/api/delete.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/resolvers/generate.ts
[error] 179-179: Unnecessary continue statement
Unsafe fix: Delete the unnecessary continue statement
(lint/correctness/noUnnecessaryContinue)
[error] 273-273: Unnecessary continue statement
Unsafe fix: Delete the unnecessary continue statement
(lint/correctness/noUnnecessaryContinue)
[error] 583-583: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
🔇 Additional comments (49)
src/utils/index.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM! New utility module export added.The addition of
export * from './getters';is consistent with the existing export pattern and aligns with the broader restructuring of utility functions mentioned in the PR summary. This change enhances the modularity of the codebase by making the new getters utilities accessible through this barrel file..gqmrc.json (1)
5-5: LGTM! Verify usage of the renamed module.The renaming from "gqlModule" to "gqmModule" is consistent with changes mentioned in other files. This change appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort to standardize naming conventions.
To ensure this change doesn't break anything, please verify that all references to this configuration key have been updated accordingly. Run the following script to check for any remaining occurrences of "gqlModule":
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following script to confirm the absence of "gqlModule" in all configuration files:
Please run the following corrected script to confirm the absence of "gqlModule" in all configuration files:
Verified: All references to "gqlModule" have been removed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining occurrences of "gqlModule" # Test: Search for "gqlModule". Expect: No results, indicating all occurrences have been updated. rg '"gqlModule"' --type-add 'config:*.{json,js,ts}' -t configLength of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm that "gqlModule" is not present in any configuration files. # Step 1: Find all relevant configuration files config_files=$(fd ".*" . -e json -e js -e ts --type config) # Step 2: Search for "gqlModule" within the found files echo "Searching for 'gqlModule' in configuration files..." echo "$config_files" | xargs grep -H '"gqlModule"' || echo "No occurrences of 'gqlModule' found."Length of output: 484
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm that "gqlModule" is not present in any configuration files. # Step 1: Find all relevant configuration files with .json, .js, and .ts extensions config_files=$(fd -e json -e js -e ts) # Step 2: Search for "gqlModule" within the found files if [ -n "$config_files" ]; then echo "Searching for 'gqlModule' in configuration files..." echo "$config_files" | xargs grep -H '"gqlModule"' || echo "No occurrences of 'gqlModule' found." else echo "No configuration files found to search." fiLength of output: 5320
src/resolvers/index.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM! Verify impact on existing imports.The changes align with the described refactoring, removing exports for
./mutationsand./resolverswhile adding an export for./generate. This suggests a shift towards a more dynamic resolver generation approach.To ensure these changes don't introduce breaking changes, please verify that all existing imports have been updated accordingly. Run the following script to check for any remaining imports of the removed modules:
If the script returns any results, those files will need to be updated to use the new
./generatemodule or alternative imports..eslintrc (3)
11-11: LGTM: Simplified configuration for@typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises.The change from
["error"]to"error"is a valid simplification of the ESLint rule configuration. The effect remains the same, enforcing that promises are properly handled.
8-8: Consider the implications of disabling@typescript-eslint/ban-types.Turning off this rule allows the use of empty object types (
{}) and theFunctiontype, which might lead to less type-safe code. While this may be necessary for specific use cases, it's important to ensure that it doesn't compromise type safety across the project.Could you provide more context on why this rule needs to be disabled? Are there specific parts of the codebase that require the use of these types?
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of empty object types and Function type rg -t ts -t tsx '(: *\{\}|: *Function)' --stats
9-9: Reconsider disabling@typescript-eslint/no-namespace.Disabling this rule allows the use of TypeScript namespaces, which are generally considered outdated in modern TypeScript. While this might be necessary for legacy code or specific architectural decisions, it's worth reviewing if there are more modern alternatives (like ES modules) that could be used instead.
Could you explain the rationale behind allowing namespaces? Are there plans to migrate away from them in the future?
✅ Verification successful
Namespaces are only used in generated code, disabling the rule is acceptable.
- All namespace usages are found in
tests/generated/client/index.ts, which is generated code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of namespaces in TypeScript files rg -t ts -t tsx '(namespace|module) \w+ \{' --statsLength of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of namespaces in TypeScript files (.ts and .tsx) rg '(namespace|module)\s+\w+\s*\{' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' --statsLength of output: 2396
src/context.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-10: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The removal of unused imports (
DocumentNodeandEntity) aligns with the changes in theContexttype definition. This cleanup improves code maintainability by removing unnecessary dependencies.
26-29: LGTM: FullContext type updated for consistency.The
FullContexttype has been correctly updated to use the same genericDateTypeasContext. This change ensures type consistency and improves overall type safety in the codebase.
Line range hint
13-25: LGTM: Context type updated with improved flexibility.The addition of the generic type parameter for
DateTypeenhances type safety and flexibility. The removal ofdocumentandhandleUploadsproperties aligns with the import changes and suggests a refactoring of related functionalities.To ensure these changes don't introduce breaking changes, please verify the usage of
Contexttype across the codebase:✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Context type updated with improved flexibility and safe removal of unused properties.
The addition of the generic type parameter for
DateTypeenhances type safety and flexibility. The removal ofdocumentandhandleUploadsproperties does not impact the codebase as they are no longer in use.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of Context type and removed properties # Test 1: Search for Context type usage echo "Searching for Context type usage:" rg -p "Context[<\s]" --type ts # Test 2: Check for any remaining usage of removed properties echo "Checking for usage of removed properties:" rg -p "context\.(document|handleUploads)" --type ts # Test 3: Look for any TODO or FIXME comments related to Context echo "Searching for TODO/FIXME comments related to Context:" rg -p "TODO|FIXME.*Context" --type tsLength of output: 6098
src/bin/gqm/gqm.ts (3)
49-49: New feature: Automatic resolver generation.The addition of
generateResolversis a significant new feature. Please ensure that:
- The generated resolvers are correct and follow best practices.
- This new functionality is properly tested, including edge cases.
- The project's documentation is updated to reflect this new capability.
Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for the
generateResolversfunction or updating the documentation?To verify the implementation of
generateResolvers, run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of generateResolvers # Test: Display the content of the generateResolvers function ast-grep --pattern $'function generateResolvers($_) { $$$ }'
40-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReview changes in schema generation and mutation handling.
- The renaming of
gqlModuletogqmModuleshould be consistent across the project.- The schema is now generated as a TypeScript file (
schema/index.ts) instead of GraphQL (schema.graphql). Ensure this change is reflected in the project's documentation and that consumers of the schema are updated accordingly.- The
generateMutationsfunction no longer takesgqlModuleas a parameter. Verify that this doesn't break any existing functionality.Run the following script to check for any remaining usages of
gqlModule:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of gqlModule # Test: Search for 'gqlModule'. Expect: No results or only in comments/documentation. rg 'gqlModule'Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind generating the schema as a TypeScript file instead of a GraphQL file, as this is a significant change in how the schema is represented.
Also applies to: 42-43
13-13: Verify the impact of import changes.The renaming of
printSchemaAsVariablestoprintSchemaAsVariableand the addition ofgenerateResolversimport suggest significant changes in the codebase. Please ensure that:
- All usages of
printSchemaAsVariableshave been updated throughout the project.- The new
generateResolversfunction is properly implemented and tested.Run the following script to check for any remaining usages of
printSchemaAsVariables:Also applies to: 16-16
tests/api/query.spec.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM. Verify test suite integrity after import change.The change from a local
gqlimport to usinggraphql-requestlooks intentional and is likely part of a larger refactoring effort. This standardization can improve consistency across the project.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues:
- Verify that all tests in this file and other affected files still pass.
- Update the project's dependencies to include
graphql-requestif not already done.Run the following script to check for any other files that might need similar updates:
✅ Verification successful
Import change verified successfully.
All local
gqlimports have been updated to usegraphql-request, and the dependency is correctly listed inpackage.json.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any remaining local 'gql' imports that might need updating # Test: Search for local 'gql' imports echo "Files with local 'gql' imports:" rg "import.*gql.*from '\.\..*'" --type ts # Test: Verify graphql-request is in package.json echo "Checking if graphql-request is in package.json:" jq '.dependencies["graphql-request"] // .devDependencies["graphql-request"] // "Not found"' package.jsonLength of output: 348
docs/docs/7-graphql-client.md (4)
24-26: LGTM: Improved imports and destructuring.The changes enhance code readability and type safety. The import statements are well-organized, and the use of type parameters in
executeGraphqlis a good practice.Also applies to: 29-32
61-63: LGTM: Improved imports and query hook usage.The changes enhance code consistency and type safety. The import statements are well-organized, and the use of type parameters in the
useQueryhook is a good practice.Also applies to: 67-67
106-108: LGTM: Improved mutation query formatting.The changes enhance the readability of the GraphQL mutation queries. The consistent structure between different mutations improves overall code clarity.
Also applies to: 114-116
150-165: LGTM: Improved form JSX formatting.The changes enhance code readability and follow React best practices for JSX formatting. The consistent indentation and line breaks make the form structure clearer while maintaining its functionality.
src/bin/gqm/settings.ts (1)
61-63: LGTM! Verify consistent naming across the codebase.The change from
gqlModuletogqmModulealigns with the project-wide naming convention update mentioned in the AI summary. This change improves consistency.To ensure this change is applied consistently across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Consistent renaming to
gqmModuleconfirmed.No remaining instances of
gqlModulefound across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'gqlModule' in the codebase # Test: Search for 'gqlModule'. Expect: No results, indicating consistent renaming. rg 'gqlModule' --type ts --type json # Test: Confirm the presence of 'gqmModule' in relevant files. Expect: Multiple results. rg 'gqmModule' --type ts --type jsonLength of output: 702
src/resolvers/node.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-231: Summary: Minor refactoring aligns with PR objectives.The changes in this file primarily involve restructuring imports and subtle modifications to use newly imported utility functions. These alterations align with the PR's objective of streamlining utility function organization. The core logic of the resolver functions remains intact, maintaining the file's primary functionality while potentially improving code organization and maintainability.
Line range hint
1-11: LGTM! Verify usage of newgetfunction.The core logic of
getResolverNodeandgetRootFieldNodefunctions remains intact. The changes likely involve using the newly importedgetfunction to retrieveselectionSet, which aligns with the utility function restructuring mentioned in the PR summary.To ensure the correct usage of the new
getfunction, please run the following verification script:#!/bin/bash # Verify the usage of the new get function in getResolverNode and getRootFieldNode echo "Checking usage of get function in getResolverNode and getRootFieldNode:" rg -p "get\(.*selectionSet" "src/resolvers/node.ts"Also applies to: 14-231
12-13: LGTM! Verify new import locations.The changes in import statements align with the restructuring of utility functions mentioned in the PR summary. This reorganization likely improves modularity and clarity.
To ensure the correctness of these new imports, please run the following verification script:
src/db/generate.ts (5)
47-53: LGTM: NewFull${model.name}type added.The addition of the
Full${model.name}type is a good improvement. It enhances type safety by combining the model with its root model when applicable, which should help in scenarios involving model inheritance.
Line range hint
117-150: LGTM:getFieldTypefunction remains consistent.The
getFieldTypefunction has not been modified, which is good. It suggests that the core logic for determining field types is still valid and consistent with the rest of the changes made in this file.
Line range hint
1-180: Overall assessment: Improved type definitions with potential implications.The changes in this file primarily focus on enhancing type definitions and improving the handling of nullable fields. The introduction of the
Full${model.name}type and the modifications to nullable field handling in${model.name}Initializerand${model.name}Mutatortypes are the most significant changes.These improvements should lead to better type safety and more accurate representations of your database models in TypeScript. However, the changes to nullable field handling might have broader implications on how null values are treated throughout your application.
Action items:
- Ensure that the new nullable field behavior aligns with your database schema and ORM expectations.
- Update any related documentation to reflect these type changes, especially regarding the new
Full${model.name}type and the modified behavior of nullable fields.- Consider running a comprehensive test suite to catch any potential type-related issues that might have been introduced by these changes.
To ensure these changes don't introduce any unintended consequences, please run your test suite and pay special attention to any tests involving null value handling in your models.
2-2: LGTM: Import statements updated.The changes to the import statements look good. The reorganization of utility functions and the addition of the
getfunction import suggest improved modularity.To ensure the new
getfunction is used correctly throughout the file, please run the following script:Also applies to: 5-5
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Correct usage of the
getfunction insrc/db/generate.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the newly imported 'get' function # Test: Search for occurrences of the 'get' function rg '\bget\s*\(' src/db/generate.tsLength of output: 110
65-65: Verify the impact of changes to nullable field handling.The modifications to how nullable fields are handled in
${model.name}Initializerand${model.name}Mutatortypes appear to make the types more permissive. This change allows for null values in more cases, which might be intentional but could also potentially lead to unexpected null values in the database.Please confirm that this change aligns with the intended behavior of your database schema and ORM layer. You may want to run the following script to check for any potential issues:
Also applies to: 79-79
docs/docs/1-tutorial.md (8)
24-51: Improved CSS structure and readabilityThe CSS changes enhance the code's structure and readability:
- Added semicolons to @apply rules for consistency.
- Consolidated heading selectors (h1, h2, h3, h4) with a single @apply font-bold directive.
- Improved overall formatting and organization of CSS classes.
These changes align with best practices for Tailwind CSS usage and improve the maintainability of the styles.
77-83: Improved JSX formatting in Home componentThe changes to the Home component enhance code readability:
- Added parentheses for multi-line JSX return statement.
- Improved indentation for better code structure.
These formatting improvements align with React best practices and make the code easier to read and maintain.
99-101: Important Next.js configuration for external packagesThe addition of 'knex' to serverComponentsExternalPackages in next.config.mjs is crucial:
- It ensures proper functioning of server components with the Knex.js library.
- This configuration is necessary for compatibility between Next.js server components and external packages like Knex.
This change is essential for the correct operation of the application when using Knex.js in server components.
166-173: Enhanced Page component with improved formatting and conditional renderingThe updates to the Page component offer several improvements:
- Better JSX formatting with parentheses for multi-line returns.
- Correct implementation of conditional rendering for login/logout links.
- Consistent and proper indentation throughout the component.
These changes enhance code readability and demonstrate good React practices for conditional rendering.
186-197: Critical additions to user model for authenticationThe new fields added to the user model are essential for proper user management:
- 'authId': Crucial for linking the user to the authentication provider.
- 'username': Important for user identification within the application.
- Both fields are correctly set as non-null String types.
These additions ensure that each user record contains the necessary information for authentication and user experience. Make sure to update any existing user-related queries or mutations to include these new fields where appropriate.
Line range hint
242-252: Updated GET_ME query to include usernameThe GET_ME GraphQL query has been appropriately updated:
- Added the 'username' field to the query.
- This change is consistent with the earlier additions to the user model.
- The query is correctly formatted and uses the gql tag from graphql-request.
This update ensures that the username is retrieved along with the user ID, which is crucial for displaying user-specific information in the UI.
263-282: Enhanced Home component with user data integrationThe Home component has been significantly improved:
- Proper import of necessary types and queries.
- Utilization of executeGraphql function to fetch user data.
- Conditional rendering of user-specific content (username and logout link).
- Improved JSX formatting and consistent indentation.
These changes effectively integrate user authentication into the component, providing a personalized experience for logged-in users while maintaining a clean and readable code structure.
Line range hint
385-419: Comprehensive update to Home component with post functionalityThe Home component has been significantly enhanced:
- Proper import of necessary types, queries, and mutations.
- Conditional rendering of the CreatePost component for authenticated users.
- Inclusion of the Posts component with user data passed as a prop.
- Maintained clean and consistent code structure.
These changes effectively integrate post creation and display functionality into the main component, providing a richer user experience while maintaining code clarity.
src/schema/generate.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to include
isQueriableFieldandisRootModelfrom '../models/utils'. This change aligns with the usage of these functions in the file.
177-179: Verify impact of field name generation change.The method for generating field names in the Query object has changed from using a
typeToFieldfunction to directly usingmodel.asField. This could potentially alter the GraphQL schema structure.Please run the following script to check for any breaking changes in the generated schema:
If there are significant differences, especially in field names, consider updating any affected client code or documenting these changes in the PR description.
Also applies to: 184-184
src/client/mutations.ts (1)
58-82: Well-structured generation of theMUTATIONSexport.The code effectively organizes the generated mutations into a structured export, grouping them by model. This enhances readability and maintainability of the mutation definitions.
src/models/utils.ts (2)
1-1: Import Statement Updated CorrectlyThe updated import statement now includes
lowerFirstfromlodash, which is utilized in thetypeToFieldfunction. Removing unused imports enhances code cleanliness.
23-23: RefactoredtypeToFieldFunction Enhances ReadabilityUsing
lowerFirstfromlodashsimplifies thetypeToFieldfunction, improving readability and consistency with standard library usage.src/resolvers/resolver.ts (2)
10-10: Ensure all imports of utility functions are updatedThe
getandsummonByKeyfunctions are now imported from'../utils/getters'instead of'../models/utils'. Please verify that all other modules in the codebase have updated their import paths accordingly to prevent any import errors.Run the following script to check for outdated imports:
✅ Verification successful
All utility function imports are correctly updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any imports of 'get' or 'summonByKey' from '../models/utils' rg "import.*\{.*\b(get|summonByKey)\b.*\}.*from ['\"]\.\./models/utils['\"]" -t tsLength of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any imports of 'get' or 'summonByKey' from '../models/utils' rg "import\s+\{\s*(get|summonByKey)\s*\}\s+from\s+['\"]\.\./models/utils['\"]" -t tsLength of output: 90
19-19: Verify compatibility of the updatedresolvefunction signatureThe addition of the generic type parameter
<DateType extends AnyDateType = AnyDateType>to theresolvefunction enhances type safety by allowing flexibility in date types withinFullContext<DateType>. Ensure that all calls toresolveacross the codebase are compatible with this new signature to prevent any type conflicts.Run the following script to identify any usages of
resolvethat may need to be updated:✅ Verification successful
All
resolvefunction calls are compatible with the updated signatureNo type conflicts found with the new generic type parameter in
resolve. All existing calls use the default type parameter and are compatible.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all function calls to 'resolve' that may not include the new generic type parameter. # Search for 'resolve' calls without a generic type parameter ast-grep 'resolve($_, $_)' --lang tsLength of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all function calls to 'resolve' that do not include the new generic type parameter. # Corrected ast-grep command with --pattern flag ast-grep --pattern 'resolve($_, $_)' --lang tsLength of output: 424
src/permissions/check.ts (1)
5-5: Verify updated import paths for utility functionsThe
isRelationfunction is now imported from'../models/utils', and thegetfunction is imported from'../utils/getters'. Please ensure that these functions are correctly exported from their new locations and that all references to them within this file and elsewhere in the codebase are updated accordingly.Run the following script to verify that all imports of
getandisRelationacross the codebase are updated to the new paths:Also applies to: 7-7
✅ Verification successful
Import Paths Successfully Verified
All imports for
getandisRelationhave been updated to their new paths, and no outdated import paths were found in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify imports of 'get' and 'isRelation' are using the correct paths. # Check for 'get' imports rg -F "import { get } from '../utils/getters'" # Check for 'isRelation' imports rg -F "import { isRelation } from '../models/utils'" # Verify no outdated import paths are used echo "Checking for outdated import paths..." rg -F "import { get } from '../models/utils'" rg -F "import { isRelation } from '../old/path/to/utils'"Length of output: 589
src/models/models.ts (3)
Line range hint
5-20: Approved: Import statements updated appropriatelyThe import of
Actionand other type definitions enhances type safety and consistency throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
345-349: Approved: Properties initialized correctly in the constructorThe initialization of
asField,pluralField,slug,labelPlural, andlabelusing utility functions is appropriate and ensures consistent naming conventions.
504-504: Approved: Enhanced reverse relation namingThe use of
asFieldandpluralFieldin theReverseRelationconstructor improves the clarity and consistency of reverse relation names.src/migrations/generate.ts (4)
18-18: Importing 'get' and 'summonByName' utility functions is appropriateThe added import statement correctly includes the
getandsummonByNamefunctions from'../utils/getters', which are utilized in the code.
185-185: Ensure correct mapping of IDs in revision data populationUsing
${model.asField}Id: row.idaccurately maps the originalidfrom the main table to the${model.asField}Idin the revision table, maintaining consistency.
443-443: Correctly reference 'model.asField' in revision table creationDefining the foreign key with
table.uuid('${model.asField}Id').notNullable();ensures the revision table correctly references the main table using the appropriate field name.
476-476: Verify SQL subquery correctness with 'model.asField'The SQL subquery uses
${model.asField}Idto join the main table and the revision table. Confirm that${model.asField}Idcorrectly represents the intended foreign key and that the subquery functions as expected.Run the following script to check for the correct usage of
${model.asField}Idin the codebase:✅ Verification successful
SQL subquery for
${model.asField}Idis correctly implemented and consistent across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences of model.asFieldId usage to ensure consistency. # Test: Find all instances where model.asFieldId is used. rg -F "${model.asField}Id"Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences of ${model.asField}Id usage to ensure consistency. # Corrected: Use single quotes to prevent shell variable expansion. rg -F '${model.asField}Id'Length of output: 663
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition or assignment of model.asField to verify its correctness. # Search for where model.asField is defined or assigned. rg 'model\.asField\s*='Length of output: 25
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of model.asField to verify its definition and usage. rg 'model\.asField'Length of output: 867
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for definitions or assignments of the 'asField' property within the model. # Search for property declarations in classes or interfaces rg 'asField\s*[:=]' # Additionally, search for assignments within constructors or methods rg 'this\.asField\s*='Length of output: 479
| @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ for (const oid of Object.values(dateOids)) { | |||
| } | |||
| `; | |||
|
|
|||
| export const GET_ME = `import { gql } from '@smartive/graphql-magic'; | |||
| export const GET_ME = `import { gql } from 'graphql-request'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Update remaining references to '@smartive/graphql-magic'.
The script identified multiple files still referencing @smartive/graphql-magic:
package.jsonpackage-lock.jsonsrc/bin/gqm/templates.tssrc/bin/gqm/settings.tsdocs/docs/1-tutorial.mddocs/docs/6-graphql-server.md
Please update these references to use graphql-request to complete the refactoring.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify impact and update documentation.
The change from '@smartive/graphql-magic' to 'graphql-request' for the gql import aligns with the broader refactoring effort mentioned in the summary. This standardization is good for consistency across the codebase.
To ensure a smooth transition, please:
- Verify that all other parts of the codebase that interact with this template have been updated accordingly.
- Update any relevant documentation or comments related to GraphQL query handling to reflect this change.
Run the following script to check for any remaining references to '@smartive/graphql-magic':
If the script returns any results, those files may need to be updated to use 'graphql-request' instead.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for remaining references to '@smartive/graphql-magic'
# Test: Search for '@smartive/graphql-magic' in the codebase
rg -i "@smartive/graphql-magic"
Length of output: 844
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| import { gql } from '../../src'; | |||
| import { gql } from 'graphql-request'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update remaining test files to use graphql-request for gql
The following test files still import gql from the old source. Please update them to use graphql-request for consistency:
tests/generated/schema/index.tstests/generated/client/mutations.tstests/api/query.spec.tstests/api/delete.spec.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify compatibility of the new gql import
The change from a local import to using graphql-request for gql looks good. This standardization can improve consistency across the project.
Please ensure that:
- The
gqlfunction from 'graphql-request' is fully compatible with its usage in this file. - Similar changes have been made in other test files using
gql.
Run the following script to check for other files that might need updating:
If any files are found, consider updating them for consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find other test files that might need updating for gql import
# Test: Search for files still using the old import
rg -l "import \{ gql \} from '../../src';" tests/
Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all instances of `gql` imports in test files
# Search for any import statement importing `gql` in the tests/ directory
rg -l 'import\s+{\s*gql\s*}\s+from\s+["'\''][^"\'']+["'\''];' tests/
Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all instances of `gql` imports in test files
# Search for any import statement importing `gql` in the tests/ directory
rg -l 'import\s+{\s*gql\s*}\s+from\s+["'\''"][^"'\''"]+["'\''"];' tests/
Length of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all instances of `gql` imports in test files
# Search for any import statement importing `gql` in the tests/ directory
rg -l "import\s+\{\s*gql\s*\}\s+from\s+['\"][^'\"]+['\"];" tests/
Length of output: 220
| return ( | ||
| <div> | ||
| {res?.data?.posts.map((post) => ( | ||
| <div key={post.id}> | ||
| <article> | ||
| <h2>{post.title}</h2> | ||
| <div>by {post.createdBy.username}</div> | ||
| <p>{post.content}</p> | ||
| <h4>Comments</h4> | ||
| {post.comments.map((comment) => ( | ||
| <div key={comment.id}> | ||
| <div>{comment.createdBy.username}</div> | ||
| <p>{comment.content}</p> by {comment.createdBy.username} | ||
| </div> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </article> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve data access consistency.
The JSX formatting changes enhance code readability and follow React best practices. However, there's an inconsistency in data access.
The useQuery hook destructures data, but the JSX uses res?.data?.posts. This should be corrected to use data?.posts directly:
- {res?.data?.posts.map((post) => (
+ {data?.posts.map((post) => (
<div key={post.id}>
...
</div>
))}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return ( | |
| <div> | |
| {res?.data?.posts.map((post) => ( | |
| <div key={post.id}> | |
| <article> | |
| <h2>{post.title}</h2> | |
| <div>by {post.createdBy.username}</div> | |
| <p>{post.content}</p> | |
| <h4>Comments</h4> | |
| {post.comments.map((comment) => ( | |
| <div key={comment.id}> | |
| <div>{comment.createdBy.username}</div> | |
| <p>{comment.content}</p> by {comment.createdBy.username} | |
| </div> | |
| ))} | |
| </article> | |
| </div> | |
| ))} | |
| </div> | |
| ); | |
| return ( | |
| <div> | |
| {data?.posts.map((post) => ( | |
| <div key={post.id}> | |
| <article> | |
| <h2>{post.title}</h2> | |
| <div>by {post.createdBy.username}</div> | |
| <p>{post.content}</p> | |
| <h4>Comments</h4> | |
| {post.comments.map((comment) => ( | |
| <div key={comment.id}> | |
| <div>{comment.createdBy.username}</div> | |
| <p>{comment.content}</p> by {comment.createdBy.username} | |
| </div> | |
| ))} | |
| </article> | |
| </div> | |
| ))} | |
| </div> | |
| ); |
| 'use server'; | ||
|
|
||
| const res = await executeGraphql<CreateCommentMutationMutation, CreateCommentMutationMutationVariables>({ | ||
| query: CREATE_COMMENT, | ||
| variables: { | ||
| data: { | ||
| postId, | ||
| content: formData.get('content') as string | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| console.log(res) | ||
| revalidatePath('/') | ||
| content: formData.get('content') as string, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| console.log(res); | ||
| revalidatePath('/'); | ||
| } | ||
| return <form action={createComment}> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <textarea name="content" placeholder="Leave a comment..." /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <button type="submit">Send</button> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </form> | ||
| return ( | ||
| <form action={createComment}> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <textarea name="content" placeholder="Leave a comment..." /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <button type="submit">Send</button> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </form> | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Functional CreateComment component implemented
The CreateComment component is well-structured for adding comments to posts:
- Uses a server action (createComment) for form submission.
- Correctly executes the CREATE_COMMENT mutation with necessary data.
- Includes a textarea for comment content.
- Utilizes revalidatePath for immediate UI update after comment creation.
- Maintains clean and consistent code structure.
Remove the console.log statement on line 496 before deploying to production.
Consider implementing error handling for the mutation execution. This could involve try/catch blocks and displaying error messages to the user if the comment creation fails.
| export const summonByName = <T extends { name: string }>(array: T[], value: string) => summonByKey(array, 'name', value); | ||
|
|
||
| export const summonByKey = <T>(array: readonly T[] | undefined, key: string, value: unknown) => | ||
| summon(array, (element: T) => lodashGet(element, key) === value, `No element found with ${key} ${value}`); | ||
|
|
||
| export const summon = <T>(array: readonly T[] | undefined, cb: Parameters<T[]['find']>[1], errorMessage?: string) => { | ||
| if (array === undefined) { | ||
| console.trace(); | ||
| throw new Error('Base array is not defined.'); | ||
| } | ||
| const result = array.find(cb); | ||
| if (result === undefined) { | ||
| console.trace(); | ||
| throw new Error(errorMessage || 'Element not found.'); | ||
| } | ||
| return result; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| type ForSure<T> = T extends undefined | null ? never : T; | ||
|
|
||
| export const it = <T>(object: T | null | undefined): ForSure<T> => { | ||
| if (object === undefined || object === null) { | ||
| console.trace(); | ||
| throw new Error('Base object is not defined.'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return object as ForSure<T>; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const get = <T, U extends keyof ForSure<T>>(object: T | null | undefined, key: U): ForSure<ForSure<T>[U]> => { | ||
| const value = it(object)[key]; | ||
| if (value === undefined || value === null) { | ||
| const error = new Error(`Object doesn't have ${String(key)}`); | ||
| console.warn(error); | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } | ||
| return value as ForSure<ForSure<T>[U]>; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const getString = (v: unknown) => { | ||
| assert(typeof v === 'string'); | ||
| return v; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add unit tests for utility functions.
These utility functions are critical for error handling and data retrieval. To ensure reliability and prevent regressions, consider adding comprehensive unit tests covering various cases and edge conditions.
Would you like assistance in generating unit tests for these functions?
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| down.push(() => { | ||
| this.renameTable(`${model.name}Revision`, `${model.oldName}Revision`); | ||
| this.alterTable(`${model.oldName}Revision`, () => { | ||
| this.renameColumn(`${typeToField(model.name)}Id`, `${typeToField(get(model, 'oldName'))}Id`); | ||
| this.renameColumn(`${model.asField}Id`, `${typeToField(get(model, 'oldName'))}Id`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify access to 'model.oldName' in down migration
Similarly, in the down migration, directly use model.oldName for consistency and clarity.
Apply this diff:
-this.renameColumn(`${model.asField}Id`, `${typeToField(get(model, 'oldName'))}Id`);
+this.renameColumn(`${model.asField}Id`, `${typeToField(model.oldName)}Id`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.renameColumn(`${model.asField}Id`, `${typeToField(get(model, 'oldName'))}Id`); | |
| this.renameColumn(`${model.asField}Id`, `${typeToField(model.oldName)}Id`); |
| @@ -94,13 +93,13 @@ | |||
| up.push(() => { | |||
| this.renameTable(`${model.oldName}Revision`, `${model.name}Revision`); | |||
| this.alterTable(`${model.name}Revision`, () => { | |||
| this.renameColumn(`${typeToField(get(model, 'oldName'))}Id`, `${typeToField(model.name)}Id`); | |||
| this.renameColumn(`${typeToField(get(model, 'oldName'))}Id`, `${model.asField}Id`); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify access to 'model.oldName' for clarity
Since model.oldName is confirmed to exist in this context (within the if (model.oldName) block), you can directly access model.oldName instead of using get(model, 'oldName'), enhancing readability.
Apply this diff to simplify the code:
-this.renameColumn(`${typeToField(get(model, 'oldName'))}Id`, `${model.asField}Id`);
+this.renameColumn(`${typeToField(model.oldName)}Id`, `${model.asField}Id`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.renameColumn(`${typeToField(get(model, 'oldName'))}Id`, `${model.asField}Id`); | |
| this.renameColumn(`${typeToField(model.oldName)}Id`, `${model.asField}Id`); |
| ); | ||
| }) | ||
| .blankLine(); | ||
| continue; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary 'continue' statement
The continue; statement at line 179 is unnecessary because it is the last statement in the loop iteration. Removing it can improve code readability.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary continue; statement:
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 179-179: Unnecessary continue statement
Unsafe fix: Delete the unnecessary continue statement
(lint/correctness/noUnnecessaryContinue)
| } | ||
| case 'cascade': |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant case clause after default
The case 'cascade': clause at line 582 is unnecessary because the default clause will handle all unmatched cases. Removing this redundant case improves code clarity.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant case clause:
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 583-583: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
| ); | ||
| }) | ||
| .blankLine(); | ||
| continue; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary 'continue' statement
The continue; statement at line 273 is unnecessary because it is the last statement in the loop iteration. Removing it can improve code readability.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary continue; statement:
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 273-273: Unnecessary continue statement
Unsafe fix: Delete the unnecessary continue statement
(lint/correctness/noUnnecessaryContinue)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
Tests