-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CCIP-4723 Feat/burn to zero address pool #15804
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Solidity Review Jira issueHey! We have taken the liberty to link this PR to a Jira issue for Solidity Review. This is a new feature, that's currently in the pilot phase, so please make sure that the linkage is correct. In a contrary case, please update it manually in JIRA and replace Solidity Review issue key in the changeset file with the correct one. Any changes to the Solidity Review Jira issue should be reflected in the changeset file. If you need to update the issue key, please do so manually in the following changeset file: This PR has been linked to Solidity Review Jira issue: CCIP-3966 |
Static analysis results are availableHey @jhweintraub, you can view Slither reports in the job summary here or download them as artifact here. |
AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅ |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
SiloedLockReleaseTokenPool
andBurnToAddressTokenPool
TransferLiquidity
Bug inHybridUSDCTokenPool
that prevents function from being called sequentially