Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Flakeguard: Keep test outputs for Flakeguard in separate fields and do not store passed outputs by default #15682

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Flakeguard: Keep test outputs for Flakeguard in separate fields and do not store passed outputs by default #15682

merged 9 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

lukaszcl
Copy link
Collaborator

@lukaszcl lukaszcl commented Dec 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@lukaszcl lukaszcl changed the title Run test with logs Flakeguard: Keep test outputs for Flakeguard in separate fields and do not store passed outputs by default Dec 16, 2024
@lukaszcl lukaszcl marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 14:08
@lukaszcl lukaszcl requested review from a team as code owners December 16, 2024 14:08
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

@lukaszcl lukaszcl requested review from a team as code owners December 16, 2024 14:48
@lukaszcl lukaszcl requested a review from jmank88 December 16, 2024 14:48
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Flakeguard Summary

Ran new or updated tests between develop and 04833e0 (TT-1899-Review-when-there-are-logs-for-some-failed-tests-TestTransmitEventProvider_Sanity).

View Flaky Detector Details | Compare Changes

Found Flaky Tests ❌

Name Pass Ratio Panicked? Timed Out? Race? Runs Successes Failures Skips Package Package Panicked? Avg Duration Code Owners
TestResolver_CronSpec 0.00% false false false 3 0 3 0 github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/v2/core/web/resolver false 0s @smartcontractkit/deployment-automation, @smartcontractkit/foundations, @smartcontractkit/core
TestResolver_CronSpec/cron_spec_success 0.00% false false false 3 0 3 0 github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/v2/core/web/resolver false 43.333333ms @smartcontractkit/deployment-automation, @smartcontractkit/foundations, @smartcontractkit/core

Artifacts

For detailed logs of the failed tests, please refer to the artifact failed-test-results-with-logs.json.

@Tofel Tofel self-requested a review December 16, 2024 16:00
@lukaszcl lukaszcl added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 16, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 0b55b62 Dec 16, 2024
103 checks passed
@lukaszcl lukaszcl deleted the TT-1899-Review-when-there-are-logs-for-some-failed-tests-TestTransmitEventProvider_Sanity branch December 16, 2024 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gheorghestrimtu gheorghestrimtu gheorghestrimtu approved these changes

@Tofel Tofel Tofel approved these changes

@jmank88 jmank88 Awaiting requested review from jmank88 jmank88 was automatically assigned from smartcontractkit/foundations

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@lukaszcl @Tofel @gheorghestrimtu