[c++] Internal function can_upgrade_soma_joinid_shape for experiment-level resize

[johnkerl]

Issue and/or context: As tracked on issue #2407 / [sc-51048].

Changes:

Continues on #3125 #3127 #3130 underpinnings toward the goal of #2964 wherein we need:

• Experiment-level upgrade/resize
• Since there are multiple arrays in an experiment, a can-we-upgrade/resize-them-all pass

Note that upgrade_domain is the full-generality dataframe domain-upgrader, but, for experiment-level work we really need the plumbing that focuses on dataframe soma_joinid shape.

Notes for Reviewer:

This PR is a work in progress. It is not ready for review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.60%. Comparing base (26b8929) to head (50054a1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3131      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.49%   82.60%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        5204     5204              
==========================================
+ Hits         4293     4299       +6     
+ Misses        911      905       -6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
python	82.60% <ø> (+0.11%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
python_api	82.60% <ø> (+0.11%)	⬆️
libtiledbsoma	∅ <ø> (∅)

[johnkerl]

Will resubmit

[johnkerl]

Replaced by #3132