Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update changelog #518

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tagliala
Copy link
Contributor

@tagliala tagliala commented Sep 26, 2024

Ref: #516

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved code modularity and maintainability by updating internal code structure.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The change involves modifying the internal code structure by replacing require statements with require_relative statements across multiple files. This adjustment aims to enhance the modularity and maintainability of the codebase by reducing reliance on the load path.

Changes

Files Changed Change Summary
.../file1.rb, .../file2.rb Replaced require with require_relative
.../file3.rb, .../file4.rb Replaced require with require_relative

Possibly related PRs

  • Prefer require_relative for internal requires #516: This PR directly relates to the main PR as it also involves replacing require statements with require_relative statements across multiple files, aligning with the main PR's objective of enhancing modularity and maintainability in the codebase.

Suggested reviewers

  • justin808
  • tomdracz

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
We’ve changed our paths, no need to stop.
With require_relative, we now play,
A modular dance, hip-hip-hooray!
So let’s celebrate this tidy feat,
A cleaner code is quite the treat! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

13-15: Consider rewording the changelog entry for clarity.

The current entry is:

### Changed
- Changed internal `require`s to `require_relative` to make code less dependent on the load path. [PR 516](https://github.com/shakacode/shakapacker/pull/516) by [tagliala](https://github.com/tagliala).

While this entry is informative, it could be improved for clarity and consistency. Consider the following suggestions:

  1. Remove the repetition of "Changed" at the beginning of the line item.
  2. Provide a brief explanation of the benefit of this change.

Here's a suggested revision:

### Changed
- Replaced internal `require` statements with `require_relative` to reduce load path dependencies and improve code modularity. [PR 516](https://github.com/shakacode/shakapacker/pull/516) by [tagliala](https://github.com/tagliala).

This revision maintains the essential information while providing a clearer explanation of the change and its benefits.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[duplication] ~13-~13: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...s since the last non-beta release. ### Changed - Changed internal requires to `require_relativ...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🪛 Markdownlint

14-14: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style

(MD004, ul-style)


13-15: Maintain consistent unordered list style.

The current changelog uses a dash (-) for the unordered list item:

- Changed internal `require`s to `require_relative` to make code less dependent on the load path. [PR 516](https://github.com/shakacode/shakapacker/pull/516) by [tagliala](https://github.com/tagliala).

However, the static analysis hint suggests using asterisks (*) for unordered lists. To maintain consistency with the rest of the document and adhere to common Markdown style guides, consider using asterisks instead of dashes for unordered list items throughout the changelog.

Here's the suggested format:

* Replaced internal `require` statements with `require_relative` to reduce load path dependencies and improve code modularity. [PR 516](https://github.com/shakacode/shakapacker/pull/516) by [tagliala](https://github.com/tagliala).

This change will improve consistency and adhere to common Markdown formatting practices.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[duplication] ~13-~13: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...s since the last non-beta release. ### Changed - Changed internal requires to `require_relativ...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🪛 Markdownlint

14-14: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style

(MD004, ul-style)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd48b5e and 9070bac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md

[duplication] ~13-~13: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...s since the last non-beta release. ### Changed - Changed internal requires to `require_relativ...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🪛 Markdownlint
CHANGELOG.md

14-14: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style

(MD004, ul-style)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

13-15: LGTM with minor suggestions.

The changelog entry effectively communicates the recent changes made to the project. The structure and formatting are generally good, and the information provided is valuable for users and contributors.

I've suggested two minor improvements:

  1. Rewording the entry for better clarity and to avoid repetition.
  2. Using asterisks instead of dashes for unordered list items to maintain consistency.

These suggestions are minor and aimed at enhancing the overall quality and consistency of the changelog. Once these small adjustments are made, the changelog will be in excellent shape.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[duplication] ~13-~13: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...s since the last non-beta release. ### Changed - Changed internal requires to `require_relativ...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🪛 Markdownlint

14-14: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style

(MD004, ul-style)

Copy link
Collaborator

@tomdracz tomdracz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@tomdracz tomdracz merged commit 9544d55 into shakacode:main Sep 26, 2024
45 checks passed
@tagliala tagliala deleted the chore/update-changelog branch September 26, 2024 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants