Test GitHub triggering review app deployments #597
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rameziophobia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent updates refine the deployment configuration and scripts for the application, involving various Dockerfiles, configuration files, and deployment scripts. Key modifications include enhanced documentation, streamlined workflows, and the introduction of template variables. Improvements in error handling and logging functionalities were made to bolster the overall robustness of the deployment process, along with the addition of new workflows for better interaction with pull requests. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant A as User
participant B as Deployment Script
participant C as Control Plane
A->>B: Trigger deployment
B->>C: Check if application exists
C-->>B: Application status
B->>C: Set up application
C->>B: Application setup confirmation
B-->>A: Deployment complete
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- .controlplane/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml (4 hunks)
- .controlplane/readme.md (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/release_script.sh (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/daily-task.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/org.yml (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/postgres.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/rails.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
- client/app/bundles/comments/rescript/CommentForm/CommentForm.res (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- client/app/bundles/comments/rescript/CommentForm/CommentForm.res
Additional comments not posted (29)
.controlplane/release_script.sh (3)
4-6: LGTM: Logging function implemented correctly.The
log()function standardizes output with timestamps, enhancing traceability.
8-11: LGTM: Error handling function implemented correctly.The
error_exit()function provides a standardized way to handle errors and exit the script.
13-22: LGTM: Script control flow and error handling are well-structured.The script correctly checks for the Rails executable and handles errors during database migrations.
.controlplane/templates/daily-task.yml (2)
23-23: LGTM: Templated image link enhances flexibility.The use of
{{APP_IMAGE_LINK}}allows for dynamic image assignment, improving adaptability.
33-34: LGTM: Templated identity link improves security.The use of
{{APP_IDENTITY_LINK}}allows for dynamic identity assignment, enhancing security..controlplane/templates/org.yml (2)
10-15: LGTM: Secrets definition is clear and flexible.The use of
{{APP_SECRETS}}allows for dynamic naming, and the sample environment variable is well-documented.
18-23: LGTM: Policy definition is clear and flexible.The use of
{{APP_SECRETS_POLICY}}allows for dynamic naming, and the policy structure is well-defined..controlplane/templates/rails.yml (2)
17-17: LGTM: Templated image link enhances flexibility.The use of
{{APP_IMAGE_LINK}}allows for dynamic image assignment, improving adaptability.
37-38: LGTM: Templated identity link improves security.The use of
{{APP_IDENTITY_LINK}}allows for dynamic identity assignment, enhancing security..controlplane/templates/app.yml (5)
3-3: LGTM: Templated name enhances flexibility.The use of
{{APP_NAME}}allows for dynamic naming, improving adaptability.
12-12: LGTM: Templated database URL enhances flexibility.The use of
{{APP_NAME}}allows for dynamic generation of the database URL, improving adaptability.
21-21: LGTM: Templated Redis URL enhances flexibility.The use of
{{APP_NAME}}allows for dynamic generation of the Redis URL, improving adaptability.
25-25: LGTM: Templated location link enhances flexibility.The use of
{{APP_LOCATION_LINK}}allows for dynamic assignment of location links, improving adaptability.
31-31: LGTM: Templated identity enhances security.The use of
{{APP_IDENTITY}}allows for dynamic identity assignment, enhancing security..github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (5)
9-13: LGTM! Commented out manual PR number input.The removal of manual PR number input aligns with the new automated approach for retrieving PR numbers.
14-17: LGTM! Workflow triggered by PR events.Triggering the workflow on pull request events to the master branch enhances responsiveness and aligns with best practices.
23-23: LGTM! Automated PR number handling.Setting the
PR_NUMBERenvironment variable using the GitHub event number is a positive enhancement for automation.
52-61: LGTM! App name construction using environment variables.Constructing the app name using environment variables based on the PR number improves flexibility and consistency in the deployment process.
33-51: LGTM! Dynamic PR number retrieval.The logic for dynamically retrieving the PR number using the GitHub API is robust and includes error handling for missing numbers.
However, verify that the API response handling correctly identifies the PR number.
Run the following script to ensure the API response handling is correct:
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (3)
50-55: LGTM! Check for application existence before setup.The conditional logic to check if an application exists before setting it up enhances robustness and prevents potential deployment errors.
22-22: LGTM! Ruby version update.The Ruby version is updated to
3.1.2. Ensure compatibility with the rest of the codebase and any dependencies.Run the following script to verify compatibility with the rest of the codebase:
Verification successful
Ruby version
3.1.2is compatible with the codebase.The
Gemfilespecifies Ruby version3.1.2, indicating compatibility with the codebase. No further issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility of Ruby version `3.1.2` with the codebase. # Test: Search for Ruby version dependencies. Expect: Compatibility with `3.1.2`. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'ruby "3.1.2"'Length of output: 221
29-29: LGTM! Installing latestcplgem version.Installing the latest version of the
cplgem can provide the latest features and fixes. Ensure compatibility with the rest of the codebase.Run the following script to verify compatibility with the latest version of the
cplgem:.controlplane/Dockerfile (2)
1-1: LGTM! Enhanced documentation for Ruby version consistency.The expanded comment specifying that the
RUBY_VERSIONshould match the version inactions.ymlenhances documentation and ensures consistency.
68-71: LGTM! Optimized asset precompilation with cleanup.Including a cleanup step to remove unnecessary build dependencies optimizes the Docker image by reducing its size and improving deployment efficiency.
.controlplane/controlplane.yml (3)
17-17: LGTM! Updated organization name for staging.Updating the organization name to reflect a staging environment aligns with best practices for testing and deployment.
37-38: LGTM! Added release script configuration.The addition of the
release_scriptconfiguration enhances the deployment process by explicitly defining the script for application releases.
61-72: LGTM! Enhanced setup app templates.The new entries under
setup_app_templatesprovide clearer guidelines for the application setup process, ensuring necessary components are specified..controlplane/readme.md (1)
66-66: LGTM! Simplified infrastructure provisioning command.Updating the command to use
cpl setup-appsimplifies the provisioning process, potentially enhancing usability and reducing complexity..controlplane/templates/postgres.yml (1)
109-109: Great improvement with the templated variable!The use of
{{APP_NAME}}enhances flexibility and adaptability across different environments.
rameziophobia
force-pushed
the
ramezweissa/test-review-app
branch
from
c6be254
to
6277c8e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml (4 hunks)
- .controlplane/readme.md (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/release_script.sh (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/daily-task.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/org.yml (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/postgres.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/rails.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
- client/app/bundles/comments/rescript/CommentForm/CommentForm.res (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- client/app/bundles/comments/rescript/CommentForm/CommentForm.res
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml
- .controlplane/readme.md
- .controlplane/release_script.sh
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml
- .controlplane/templates/daily-task.yml
- .controlplane/templates/org.yml
- .controlplane/templates/postgres.yml
- .controlplane/templates/rails.yml
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (5)
9-12: Commented-out code.These lines are commented out and not active in the current workflow. Consider removing them if they are no longer needed.
14-17: Trigger setup is correct.The workflow is correctly triggered by pull request events on the
masterbranch.
33-51: Dynamic PR number retrieval logic is robust.The logic to fetch the PR number using the GitHub API is well-implemented and handles cases where the PR number is not initially set.
Ensure that the GitHub token is correctly configured to allow API access.
52-56: App name construction logic is correct.The app name is constructed using the PR number, ensuring consistency and clarity in naming.
23-23: Verify the availability ofgithub.event.number.Ensure that
github.event.numberis always set for pull request events. If not, the subsequent logic to fetch the PR number is necessary.Run the following script to verify the availability of
github.event.number:
rameziophobia
force-pushed
the
ramezweissa/test-review-app
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0a6289c
to
f4168a9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (5)
10-13: Verify branch specification for pull request trigger.The workflow is set to trigger on pull requests to the
masterbranch. Ensure this is the intended branch for deployment triggers.
19-19: Initialization ofPR_NUMBERis correct.The
PR_NUMBERis set from the GitHub event number, which is appropriate for identifying the pull request.
29-47: Dynamic retrieval of PR number is well-implemented.The step correctly retrieves the PR number from open pull requests using the GitHub API and includes error handling if the PR number is not found.
48-52: App name construction is correct.The app name is constructed using the PR number and stored in the environment variables, which is a good practice for consistency.
56-57: Use ofAPP_NAMEvariable in deployment is appropriate.The deployment step uses the
APP_NAMEenvironment variable, ensuring consistency with the dynamically constructed app name.
rameziophobia
force-pushed
the
ramezweissa/test-review-app
branch
from
48f5a28
to
fddcccc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml (4 hunks)
- .controlplane/readme.md (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/release_script.sh (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/daily-task.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/org.yml (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/postgres.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/rails.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .controlplane/templates/org.yml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml
- .controlplane/readme.md
- .controlplane/release_script.sh
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml
- .controlplane/templates/daily-task.yml
- .controlplane/templates/postgres.yml
- .controlplane/templates/rails.yml
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml
27-27: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
30-30: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
30-30: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:66: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
30-30: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:32: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
49-49: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:76: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (3)
10-14: Configuration for triggering events is appropriate.This setup correctly targets pull request events to the
masterbranch, aligning with the intended use case of the workflow.
14-19: Proper use of secrets and environment variables.The workflow securely references secrets for sensitive information and correctly sets up
PR_NUMBERfor dynamic use.
56-57: Good use of environment variables in the deployment step.Utilizing
APP_NAMEfor deployment enhances clarity and flexibility in the workflow.
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # Identity is needed to access secrets |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why do we need this? I don't see any secrets access from app.yml? What am I missing?
If my conclusion is correct, shall we delete the lines from :27 to :31 ?
| @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | |||
| # Org level secrets are used to store sensitive information that is | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
AFAIK we don't need to set any secrets so this file isn't useful shall we delete?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml
.controlplane/release_script.sh
Outdated
| @@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ error_exit() { | |||
| exit 1 | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| # Test error! | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rameziophobia did you test error handling?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@justin808 yes, here is an example failed run I had the ENV variables messed up to make it fail
| # Triggers the workflow on pull request events | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| branches: | ||
| - master |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No projects (NONE) automatically trigger on every PR.
We either use a command in the PR comments (what popmenu does) or use the circle CI UX to manually trigger.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok, I will make it trigger the deployment when someone comments "/deploy". sounds good? If someone wants to deploy via GitHub action UI, they already can.
|
/deploy-review-app |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/add-comment-on-pr-creation.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml
34-34: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:66: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:32: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
56-56: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:76: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/add-comment-on-pr-creation.yml (1)
1-19: Consider updating the checkout action version.The use of
actions/checkout@v2is flagged by static analysis as potentially outdated. Updating to a newer version can ensure compatibility and security.- - uses: actions/github-script@v6 + - uses: actions/github-script@v3Likely invalid or redundant comment.
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1)
10-14: Consider updating the checkout action version.The use of
actions/checkout@v2is flagged by static analysis as potentially outdated. Updating to a newer version can ensure compatibility and security.- - uses: actions/checkout@v2 + - uses: actions/checkout@v3Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml
34-34: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:66: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:32: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
56-56: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:76: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
63-63: the runner of "actions/github-script@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (6)
10-18: LGTM!The new trigger for issue comments is correctly configured.
The code changes are approved.
23-25: LGTM!The
PR_NUMBERenvironment variable is correctly set using the issue number.The code changes are approved.
28-29: LGTM!The job name update and condition are correctly configured.
The code changes are approved.
36-54: Improve shell scripting practices in PR number retrieval.The script should ensure variables are properly quoted to prevent globbing and word splitting, addressing static analysis flags.
Apply these changes to improve the script:
- REF=${{ github.ref }} + REF="${{ github.ref }}" - API_RESPONSE=$(curl --location --request GET "https://api.github.com/repos/$GITHUB_REPOSITORY/pulls?state=open" \ + API_RESPONSE=$(curl --location --request GET "https://api.github.com/repos/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/pulls?state=open" \ - PR_NUMBER=$(echo $API_RESPONSE | jq '.[] | select(.head.ref=="'$REF'") | .number') + PR_NUMBER=$(echo "$API_RESPONSE" | jq '.[] | select(.head.ref=="'$REF'") | .number')Tools
actionlint
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:66: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
37-37: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:32: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
55-60: Ensure proper quoting in the application name setting script.To prevent issues with globbing and word splitting, ensure variables are properly quoted.
Apply this change to improve the script:
- echo "APP_NAME=qa-react-webpack-rails-tutorial-pr-${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}" >> $GITHUB_ENV + echo "APP_NAME=qa-react-webpack-rails-tutorial-pr-${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"Tools
actionlint
56-56: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:76: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
61-72: Consider updating the GitHub script action version.The use of
actions/github-script@v4is flagged by static analysis as potentially outdated. Updating to a newer version can ensure compatibility and security.Apply this change to update the action version:
- uses: actions/github-script@v4 + uses: actions/github-script@v5Tools
actionlint
63-63: the runner of "actions/github-script@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
rameziophobia
force-pushed
the
ramezweissa/test-review-app
branch
from
25db01f
to
f109fee
Compare
|
/deploy-review-app |
rameziophobia
force-pushed
the
ramezweissa/test-review-app
branch
from
f109fee
to
ec4031c
Compare
|
/deploy-review-app |
|
/deploy-review-app |
|
/deploy-review-app |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1)
25-27: Remove commented line for PR number retrieval.The commented line for PR number retrieval should be removed to avoid confusion.
- # PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml (3 hunks)
- .controlplane/readme.md (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/release_script.sh (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/daily-task.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/org.yml (1 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/postgres.yml (2 hunks)
- .controlplane/templates/rails.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/add-comment-on-pr-creation.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .controlplane/templates/app.yml
- .controlplane/templates/daily-task.yml
- .github/workflows/add-comment-on-pr-creation.yml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- .controlplane/controlplane.yml
- .controlplane/readme.md
- .controlplane/release_script.sh
- .controlplane/templates/org.yml
- .controlplane/templates/postgres.yml
- .controlplane/templates/rails.yml
- .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml
18-18: key "issue_comment" is duplicated in "on" section. previously defined at line:9,col:3
(syntax-check)
38-38: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
38-38: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:117: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
50-50: the runner of "actions/github-script@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
62-62: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
62-62: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:66: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
62-62: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:32: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
81-81: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:76: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (2)
30-31: LGTM!The job name update is appropriate and aligns with the workflow's purpose.
42-47: LGTM!The use of
actions/checkout@v4is appropriate and up-to-date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml
36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:117: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
48-48: the runner of "actions/github-script@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:9:66: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
60-60: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:32: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
79-79: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:76: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Additional comments not posted (7)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (7)
9-14: No action needed.The commented-out lines do not affect the workflow.
23-25: LGTM!The
PR_NUMBERenvironment variable is correctly set from the issue number.The code changes are approved.
28-32: LGTM!The job name is updated correctly, and the condition ensures the job runs only when the issue comment is
/deploy-review-appand the issue is a pull request.The code changes are approved.
40-45: LGTM!The checkout action version is correctly updated to
v4, ensuring compatibility and security.The code changes are approved.
86-87: LGTM!The deployment step is correctly configured to use the environment variables.
The code changes are approved.
33-39: Quote variables to prevent globbing and word splitting.The variables should be properly quoted to prevent globbing and word splitting.
- run: echo "PR_REF=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json headRefName | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT + run: echo "PR_REF=$(gh pr view \"$PR_NUMBER\" --repo \"${{ github.repository }}\" --json headRefName | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTLikely invalid or redundant comment.
Tools
actionlint
36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:117: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
46-57: Updateactions/github-scriptto the latest version.The use of
actions/github-script@v4is flagged as outdated. Update to the latest version to ensure compatibility and security.- uses: actions/github-script@v4 + uses: actions/github-script@v5Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Tools
actionlint
48-48: the runner of "actions/github-script@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
|
@justin808 It is not clear in the documentation but my conclusion is that we cannot test deploying via the issue_comment event on GitHub without having the new workflow already on GitHub. I will merge this but feel free to comment on the PR as if it is still open My only question is whether you had intentionally changed made these changes or not #597 (comment), #597 (comment) Next steps: I will create another PR to periodically delete unused review apps, test deploying with |
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
release_scriptconfiguration for enhanced deployment processes.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores