Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove references to redisson.* properties #283

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 24.2-docs
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tcrespog
Copy link

@tcrespog tcrespog commented Nov 6, 2024

In the next Enterprise version, redisson.* properties will be deprecated.

  • Replace /redisson/* references for the AWS parameter store with TOWER_REDIS_*.
  • Replace redisson.* references for the tower.yml with TOWER_REDIS_*. Setting TOWER_REDIS_* values directly in the YAML file (for example, TOWER_REDIS_URL: redis://...) in tower.yml is feasible.

In fact, the tweak could be backported to previous versions, as the TOWER_REDIS_* placeholders were always the source of truth. I doubt any Enterprise users were setting redisson.* properties directly, because the H8 2nd-level cache config doesn't know about them and the application would fail to start if they are not properly set.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Deploy Preview for seqera-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b7c22df
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/seqera-docs/deploys/672b6d41497d9c000812bb00
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-283--seqera-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@endre-seqera
Copy link
Member

This might be unrelated, but I've just noticed that RedissonService, does rely on redisson.uri. This means that we cannot remove this from the configuration file yet

@justinegeffen justinegeffen added 1. Editor review Needs a language review 2. Dev/PM review Needs a review by a Dev or PM labels Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1. Editor review Needs a language review 2. Dev/PM review Needs a review by a Dev or PM
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants