Big number support #95
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
BREAKING CHANGE: Bytes.toNumber and Bytes.fromNumber require type argument
mariocao
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2024
FranklinWaller
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Make it easier for developers to deal with u128 and u256. Also make it easier to test tally execution by allowing Buffers as reveal result input directly.
Explanation of Changes
We were unable to incorporate u128 and u256 in the
toNumberstatic method so we had to split them up.Testing
Added unit tests for the new methods/updated cases.
Related PRs and Issues
N.A.