We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We should finalize naming for things. I'm starting a list here of things to resolve
GeneRangesFilter
GeneRangeFilter
CanonicalFilter
genes(cols=...)
genes(columns=...)
cols
+
-
Pushing to next release:
TxRangeFilter
ExonFilter
RangeFilter
gf.ensembl.annotation
genomic-annotations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Description of feature
We should finalize naming for things. I'm starting a list here of things to resolve
GeneRangesFilter
->GeneRangeFilter
(since it only takes a single range)CanonicalFilter
-> ???genes(cols=...)
->genes(columns=...)
– Just to be more consistent. Could go the other way and usecols
everywhere.+
,-
I assume?Pushing to next release:
GeneRangeFilter
+TxRangeFilter
+ExonFilter
or all oneRangeFilter
as done in bioconductor?gf.ensembl.annotation
Do we still want to call this an annotation? I named the function when the package was calledgenomic-annotations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: