Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add coveralls code coverage support and some initial updates to the R… #110

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

objectiser
Copy link
Member

…EADME

Resolves #97

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 510bdd7 on objectiser:coveralls into ** on scribble:master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 92b7aee on objectiser:coveralls into ** on scribble:master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling aef1601 on objectiser:coveralls into ** on scribble:master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling f60eca2 on objectiser:coveralls into ** on scribble:master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling f60eca2 on objectiser:coveralls into ** on scribble:master**.

@objectiser
Copy link
Member Author

Code coverage from current tests is being reported as 4%, which doesn't seem right given the number of scribble protocols being parsed, but the parser classes are showing up as 0 testing.

It could be that the coverage is based on unit tests within the same artifact only - so we may need to add some tests locally within the parser module.

DO NOT MERGE YET until there is a better understanding.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants