Update module github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager to v1.15.4 [SECURITY] #38
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
v1.15.3
->v1.15.4
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
GHSA-r4pg-vg54-wxx4
Impact
cert-manager packages which call the standard library
pem.Decode()
function can take a long time to process specially crafted invalid PEM data.If an attacker is able to modify PEM data which cert-manager reads (e.g. in a Secret resource), they may be able to use large amounts of CPU in the cert-manager controller pod to effectively create a denial-of-service (DoS) vector for cert-manager in the cluster.
Secrets are limited in size to 1MiB, which reduces the impact of this issue; it was discovered through an ~856kB fuzz test input which causes
pem.Decode
to take roughly 750ms to reject the input on an M2 Max Macbook Pro. By way of comparison, a valid PEM-encoded 4096-bit RSA key takes roughly 70µs to parse on the same machine.Given the required size of PEM data needed to present a realistic DoS vector, an attacker would need to create or insert many different large sized resources in the cluster, and so the best secondary defense is to ensure that sensible limits are placed via RBAC.
This issue affects all versions of cert-manager to have been released since at least v0.1.0 (since
pem.Decode
is core functionality for cert-manager). All supported releases are patched.Patches
The fixed versions are v1.16.2, v1.15.4 and v1.12.14.
Workarounds
Ensure that RBAC is scoped correctly in your cluster. If a user is able to modify resources containing PEM data to be able to exploit this, it's like that those permissions are a bigger security threat than this issue - especially for Secret resources.
References
cert-manager ha a potential slowdown / DoS when parsing specially crafted PEM inputs
GHSA-r4pg-vg54-wxx4 / GO-2024-3282
More information
Details
Impact
cert-manager packages which call the standard library
pem.Decode()
function can take a long time to process specially crafted invalid PEM data.If an attacker is able to modify PEM data which cert-manager reads (e.g. in a Secret resource), they may be able to use large amounts of CPU in the cert-manager controller pod to effectively create a denial-of-service (DoS) vector for cert-manager in the cluster.
Secrets are limited in size to 1MiB, which reduces the impact of this issue; it was discovered through an ~856kB fuzz test input which causes
pem.Decode
to take roughly 750ms to reject the input on an M2 Max Macbook Pro. By way of comparison, a valid PEM-encoded 4096-bit RSA key takes roughly 70µs to parse on the same machine.Given the required size of PEM data needed to present a realistic DoS vector, an attacker would need to create or insert many different large sized resources in the cluster, and so the best secondary defense is to ensure that sensible limits are placed via RBAC.
This issue affects all versions of cert-manager to have been released since at least v0.1.0 (since
pem.Decode
is core functionality for cert-manager). All supported releases are patched.Patches
The fixed versions are v1.16.2, v1.15.4 and v1.12.14.
Workarounds
Ensure that RBAC is scoped correctly in your cluster. If a user is able to modify resources containing PEM data to be able to exploit this, it's like that those permissions are a bigger security threat than this issue - especially for Secret resources.
References
Severity
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
References
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
cert-manager ha a potential slowdown / DoS when parsing specially crafted PEM inputs in github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager
GHSA-r4pg-vg54-wxx4 / GO-2024-3282
More information
Details
cert-manager ha a potential slowdown / DoS when parsing specially crafted PEM inputs in github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager
Severity
Unknown
References
This data is provided by OSV and the Go Vulnerability Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Release Notes
cert-manager/cert-manager (github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager)
v1.15.4
Compare Source
cert-manager is the easiest way to automatically manage certificates in Kubernetes and OpenShift clusters.
This patch release of cert-manager 1.15 makes several changes to how PEM input is validated, adding maximum sizes appropriate to the type of PEM data which is being parsed.
This is to prevent an unacceptable slow-down in parsing specially crafted PEM data. The issue was found by Google's OSS-Fuzz project.
The issue is low severity; to exploit the PEM issue would require privileged access which would likely allow Denial-of-Service through other methods.
Note also that since most PEM data parsed by cert-manager comes from
ConfigMap
orSecret
resources which have a max size limit of approximately 1MB, it's difficult to force cert-manager to parse large amounts of PEM data.Further information is available in GHSA-r4pg-vg54-wxx4
In addition, the version of Go used to build cert-manager 1.15 was updated along with the base images, and a Route53 bug fix was backported.
Changes by Kind
Bug or Regression
Other (Cleanup or Flake)
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.