Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/client to ^6.22.5 #7837

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 18, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/client (source) ^6.22.4 -> ^6.22.5 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2024 21:22
@renovate renovate bot requested review from juice49 and removed request for a team November 18, 2024 21:22
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 18, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Nov 19, 2024 0:35am
performance-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Nov 19, 2024 0:35am
test-compiled-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Nov 19, 2024 0:35am
test-next-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Nov 19, 2024 0:35am
test-studio 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Nov 19, 2024 0:35am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 19, 2024 0:35am

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Component Testing Report Updated Nov 18, 2024 11:58 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (2) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 44s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 32s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 58s 9 7 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 11s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 3m 0s 0 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 45s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 44s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 18s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/RangeDecoration.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 9 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 36s 12 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 18, 2024

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:58:05 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 11.4 efps (88ms) 11.2 efps (90ms) +2ms (+2.3%)
article (body) 34.9 efps (29ms) 38.2 efps (26ms) -2ms (-8.6%)
article (string inside object) 12.0 efps (83ms) 12.9 efps (78ms) -6ms (-6.6%)
article (string inside array) 10.1 efps (100ms) 11.1 efps (90ms) -10ms (-9.5%)
recipe (name) 29.4 efps (34ms) 30.3 efps (33ms) -1ms (-2.9%)
recipe (description) 32.3 efps (31ms) 34.5 efps (29ms) -2ms (-6.5%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (7ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) -1ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 15.2 efps (66ms) 14.9 efps (67ms) +1ms (+1.5%)
synthetic (string inside object) 15.4 efps (65ms) 15.2 efps (66ms) +1ms (+1.5%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 88ms 107ms 144ms 464ms 1923ms 18.6s
article (body) 29ms 47ms 103ms 361ms 734ms 8.6s
article (string inside object) 83ms 94ms 107ms 470ms 1792ms 11.7s
article (string inside array) 100ms 119ms 179ms 513ms 3194ms 14.4s
recipe (name) 34ms 37ms 61ms 93ms 16ms 9.1s
recipe (description) 31ms 32ms 39ms 69ms 0ms 6.0s
recipe (instructions) 7ms 10ms 10ms 33ms 0ms 3.5s
synthetic (title) 66ms 69ms 80ms 345ms 1686ms 16.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 65ms 69ms 80ms 574ms 1638ms 9.9s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 90ms 106ms 159ms 506ms 1813ms 18.2s
article (body) 26ms 36ms 69ms 494ms 1165ms 9.1s
article (string inside object) 78ms 89ms 104ms 309ms 1418ms 11.8s
article (string inside array) 90ms 105ms 129ms 340ms 2166ms 12.6s
recipe (name) 33ms 36ms 42ms 112ms 27ms 8.9s
recipe (description) 29ms 32ms 34ms 67ms 0ms 6.0s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 9ms 34ms 0ms 3.4s
synthetic (title) 67ms 71ms 81ms 330ms 1336ms 16.2s
synthetic (string inside object) 66ms 68ms 81ms 587ms 1317ms 9.9s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-client-6.x branch from 284ca84 to 1608444 Compare November 18, 2024 23:39
@stipsan stipsan merged commit 2798bc9 into next Nov 18, 2024
31 of 37 checks passed
@stipsan stipsan deleted the renovate/sanity-client-6.x branch November 18, 2024 23:41
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – test-studio November 19, 2024 00:26 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – page-building-studio November 19, 2024 00:28 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – performance-studio November 19, 2024 00:29 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – test-next-studio November 19, 2024 00:31 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – test-compiled-studio November 19, 2024 00:35 Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant