Add support for index level slice count setting (opensearch-project#1…

…5336)

Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ramadurai <[email protected]>

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
 - Support filtering on a large list encoded by bitmap ([#14774](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/14774))
 - Add slice execution listeners to SearchOperationListener interface ([#15153](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/15153))
 - Adding access to noSubMatches and noOverlappingMatches in Hyphenation ([#13895](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/13895))
+- Add support for index level max slice count setting for concurrent segment search ([#15336](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/15336))
 
 ### Dependencies
 - Bump `netty` from 4.1.111.Final to 4.1.112.Final ([#15081](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/15081))

server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/common/settings/IndexScopedSettings.java

@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ public final class IndexScopedSettings extends AbstractScopedSettings {
 
                 // Settings for concurrent segment search
                 IndexSettings.INDEX_CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_SETTING,
+                IndexSettings.INDEX_CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_MAX_SLICE_COUNT,
                 IndexSettings.ALLOW_DERIVED_FIELDS,
 
                 // Settings for star tree index

server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/index/IndexSettings.java

@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
 import static org.opensearch.index.mapper.MapperService.INDEX_MAPPING_NESTED_FIELDS_LIMIT_SETTING;
 import static org.opensearch.index.mapper.MapperService.INDEX_MAPPING_TOTAL_FIELDS_LIMIT_SETTING;
 import static org.opensearch.index.store.remote.directory.RemoteSnapshotDirectory.SEARCHABLE_SNAPSHOT_EXTENDED_COMPATIBILITY_MINIMUM_VERSION;
+import static org.opensearch.search.SearchService.CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_DEFAULT_VALUE;
 
 /**
  * This class encapsulates all index level settings and handles settings updates.
@@ -691,6 +692,14 @@ public static IndexMergePolicy fromString(String text) {
         Property.Dynamic
     );
 
+    public static final Setting<Integer> INDEX_CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_MAX_SLICE_COUNT = Setting.intSetting(
+        "index.search.concurrent.max_slice_count",
+        CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
+        CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
+        Property.Dynamic,
+        Property.IndexScope
+    );
+
     public static final Setting<Boolean> INDEX_DOC_ID_FUZZY_SET_ENABLED_SETTING = Setting.boolSetting(
         "index.optimize_doc_id_lookup.fuzzy_set.enabled",
         false,

server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/search/DefaultSearchContext.java

@@ -991,7 +991,14 @@ public int getTargetMaxSliceCount() {
         if (shouldUseConcurrentSearch() == false) {
             throw new IllegalStateException("Target slice count should not be used when concurrent search is disabled");
         }
-        return clusterService.getClusterSettings().get(SearchService.CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_SETTING);
+
+        return indexService.getIndexSettings()
+            .getSettings()
+            .getAsInt(
+                IndexSettings.INDEX_CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_MAX_SLICE_COUNT.getKey(),
+                clusterService.getClusterSettings().get(SearchService.CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_SETTING)
+            );
+
     }
 
     @Override

server/src/test/java/org/opensearch/search/SearchServiceTests.java

@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
 import org.opensearch.action.support.IndicesOptions;
 import org.opensearch.action.support.PlainActionFuture;
 import org.opensearch.action.support.WriteRequest;
+import org.opensearch.cluster.service.ClusterService;
 import org.opensearch.common.UUIDs;
 import org.opensearch.common.settings.Settings;
 import org.opensearch.common.settings.SettingsException;
@@ -1413,6 +1414,106 @@ public void testConcurrentSegmentSearchSearchContext() throws IOException {
             .get();
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Tests that the slice count is calculated correctly when concurrent search is enabled
+     *  If concurrent search enabled -
+     *       pick index level slice count setting if index level setting is set
+     *       else pick default cluster level slice count setting
+     * @throws IOException
+     */
+    public void testConcurrentSegmentSearchSliceCount() throws IOException {
+
+        String index = randomAlphaOfLengthBetween(5, 10).toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT);
+        IndexService indexService = createIndex(index);
+        final SearchService service = getInstanceFromNode(SearchService.class);
+        ClusterService clusterService = getInstanceFromNode(ClusterService.class);
+        ShardId shardId = new ShardId(indexService.index(), 0);
+        long nowInMillis = System.currentTimeMillis();
+        String clusterAlias = randomBoolean() ? null : randomAlphaOfLengthBetween(3, 10);
+        SearchRequest searchRequest = new SearchRequest();
+        searchRequest.allowPartialSearchResults(randomBoolean());
+        ShardSearchRequest request = new ShardSearchRequest(
+            OriginalIndices.NONE,
+            searchRequest,
+            shardId,
+            indexService.numberOfShards(),
+            AliasFilter.EMPTY,
+            1f,
+            nowInMillis,
+            clusterAlias,
+            Strings.EMPTY_ARRAY
+        );
+        // enable concurrent search
+        client().admin()
+            .cluster()
+            .prepareUpdateSettings()
+            .setTransientSettings(Settings.builder().put(SearchService.CLUSTER_CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_SETTING.getKey(), true))
+            .get();
+
+        Integer[][] scenarios = {
+            // cluster setting, index setting, expected slice count
+            // expected value null will pick up default value from settings
+            { null, null, clusterService.getClusterSettings().get(SearchService.CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_SETTING) },
+            { 4, null, 4 },
+            { null, 3, 3 },
+            { 4, 3, 3 }, };
+
+        for (Integer[] sliceCounts : scenarios) {
+            Integer clusterSliceCount = sliceCounts[0];
+            Integer indexSliceCount = sliceCounts[1];
+            Integer targetSliceCount = sliceCounts[2];
+
+            if (clusterSliceCount != null) {
+                client().admin()
+                    .cluster()
+                    .prepareUpdateSettings()
+                    .setTransientSettings(
+                        Settings.builder()
+                            .put(SearchService.CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_SETTING.getKey(), clusterSliceCount)
+                    )
+                    .get();
+            } else {
+                client().admin()
+                    .cluster()
+                    .prepareUpdateSettings()
+                    .setTransientSettings(
+                        Settings.builder().putNull(SearchService.CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_SETTING.getKey())
+                    )
+                    .get();
+            }
+            if (indexSliceCount != null) {
+                client().admin()
+                    .indices()
+                    .prepareUpdateSettings(index)
+                    .setSettings(
+                        Settings.builder().put(IndexSettings.INDEX_CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_MAX_SLICE_COUNT.getKey(), indexSliceCount)
+                    )
+                    .get();
+            } else {
+                client().admin()
+                    .indices()
+                    .prepareUpdateSettings(index)
+                    .setSettings(Settings.builder().putNull(IndexSettings.INDEX_CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_MAX_SLICE_COUNT.getKey()))
+                    .get();
+            }
+
+            try (DefaultSearchContext searchContext = service.createSearchContext(request, new TimeValue(System.currentTimeMillis()))) {
+                searchContext.evaluateRequestShouldUseConcurrentSearch();
+                assertEquals(targetSliceCount.intValue(), searchContext.getTargetMaxSliceCount());
+            }
+        }
+        // cleanup
+        client().admin()
+            .cluster()
+            .prepareUpdateSettings()
+            .setTransientSettings(
+                Settings.builder()
+                    .putNull(SearchService.CLUSTER_CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_SETTING.getKey())
+                    .putNull(SearchService.CONCURRENT_SEGMENT_SEARCH_TARGET_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_SETTING.getKey())
+            )
+            .get();
+    }
+
     /**
      * Test that the Search Context for concurrent segment search enabled is set correctly at the time of construction.
      * The same is used throughout the context object lifetime even if cluster setting changes before the request completion.